Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Bilateral dispensing clinical trial of fanfilcon A toric lens verses enfilcon A toric lens over two weeks.
Evaluation of the clinical performance of an investigational silicone-hydrogel lens called fanfilcon A (test) compared to a FDA-cleared commercially available contact lens called enfilcon A toric lens (control) when worn on a daily wear basis over 2 weeks in a randomized, bilateral, cross-over, dispensing study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| fanfilcon A | Experimental | Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair. |
|
| enfilcon A | Active Comparator | Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fanfilcon A | Device | contact lens |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort (Subjective Rating Scale) | Participant rating for comfort at dispense visit and at the 2 week follow-up on a subjective rating scale (0-100, 0=cannot be worn. Causes pain,100=Cannot be felt ever) | Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeks |
| Comfort Preference | Subjective assessment for comfort preference for each lens pair. Choices: fanfilcon A lens, enfilcon A lens, No preference. | Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Are at least 17 years of age for Canada and 18 years of age for the USA and have full legal capacity to volunteer;
Have read and signed an information consent letter;
Are willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
Are an adapted soft contact lens wearer;
Require spectacle lens powers in both eyes;
Are willing to wear contact lens in both eyes;
Have manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR equivalent of 20/25 in each eye;
To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must have VA of logMAR equivalent of 20/30 or better in each eye with the study lenses and the investigator must judge the fit including toric orientation as acceptable;
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Meng Lin, OD PhD | Clinical Research Center, University of California, Berkeley | Principal Investigator |
| Lyndon Jones, PhD FCO | Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Research Center, University of California, Berkeley | Berkeley | California | 94704 | United States | ||
44 subjects were enrolled (assigned an ID per protocol), but 11 were not assigned to any group due to screen failure.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Randomized for Fanfilcon A Lens First, Then Enfilcon A Lens | Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair. fanfilcon A: toric contact lens enfilcon A: toric contact lens |
| FG001 | Randomized for Enfilcon A Lens First, Then Fanfilcon A Lens | Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair. fanfilcon A: toric contact lens enfilcon A: toric contact lens |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lens 1 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Lens 2 |
|
Includes the 11 participants who were considered enrolled, but were screen failures and not randomly assigned to a particular arm.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Overall Study | All subjects were wore both fanfilcon A and enfilcon A toric lenses as either the first or second intervention. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Comfort (Subjective Rating Scale) | Participant rating for comfort at dispense visit and at the 2 week follow-up on a subjective rating scale (0-100, 0=cannot be worn. Causes pain,100=Cannot be felt ever) | Analysis population differs slightly due to 1 participant who was excluded from analysis due to a protocol deviation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeks |
|
Adverse event data were collected through the duration of the study (2 weeks for each lens).
Adverse events data was collected during the follow-up visits and until the subject exited the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Fanfilcon A | Participants randomized to wear fanfilcon A either as the first or second lens during the cross over study. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myhanh Nguyen, OD | CooperVision | 9257306716 | mnguyen@coopervision.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009216 | Myopia |
| D006956 | Hyperopia |
| D001251 | Astigmatism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| enfilcon A |
| Device |
contact lens |
|
| Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo |
| Waterloo |
| Ontario |
| N2L 3G1 |
| Canada |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Comfort Preference | Subjective assessment for comfort preference for each lens pair. Choices: fanfilcon A lens, enfilcon A lens, No preference. | Analysis population differs slightly due to protocol deviation. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 33 |
| 0 |
| 33 |
| 0 |
| 33 |
| EG001 | Enfilcon A | Participants randomized to wear enfilcon A either as the first or second lens during the cross over study. | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
Disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor should be notified of any results communications and has ability to review.
| No Preference |
|