Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of senofilcon A lens with the stenfilcon A lens each for one week of daily disposable wear.
The purpose of this bilateral cross-over study is to evaluate the clinical performance of senofilcon A lens with the stenfilcon A lens. In particular, the study will focus on ocular physiology, lens fit, lens surface, visual acuity, and subjective response.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senofilcon A | Active Comparator | Participants were randomized to wear senofilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. |
|
| Stenfilcon A | Active Comparator | Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senofilcon A | Device | contact lens |
| |
| Stenfilcon A |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ocular Physiology | Ocular physiology assessment of senofilcon A and stenfilcon A lenses by biomicroscopy for the following: corneal staining, conjunctival hyperaemia, limbal hyperaemia, and conjunctival staining. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe. | Baseline and 1 week |
| Overall Subjective Score of Lenses | Subjective responses will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, 100=excellent. | Baseline and 1 week |
| Comfort | Subjective responses for comfort will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=causes pain, cannot be tolerated, 100=excellent, cannot be felt. | Baseline and 1 week |
| Dryness | Subjective responses for dryness will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, high levels of dryness, 100=excellent, no dryness. | 1 week |
| Vision | Subjective responses for vision will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn, 100=excellent. | Baseline and 1 week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal Centration | Lens fit, horizontal centration will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at baseline for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | Baseline |
| Horizontal Centration |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carole Maldonado-Codinal, PhD | Eurolens Research, University of Manchester | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurolens Research - The University of Manchester | Manchester | M13 9PL | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Senofilcon A, Then Stenfilcon A | Participants were randomized to wear senofilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. Senofilcon A: contact lens Stenfilcon A: contact lens |
| FG001 | Stenfilcon A, Then Senofilcon A | Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. Stenfilcon A: contact lens Senofilcon A: contact lens |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention (One Week) |
| |||||||||||||
| Second Intervention (One Week) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Overall Baseline Characteristics | Participants were randomized to wear senofilcon A or stenfilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. Senofilcon A: contact lens Stenfilcon A: contact lens |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Ocular Physiology | Ocular physiology assessment of senofilcon A and stenfilcon A lenses by biomicroscopy for the following: corneal staining, conjunctival hyperaemia, limbal hyperaemia, and conjunctival staining. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe. | Protocol deviations occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 1 week |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Senofilcon A | Participants were randomized to wear senofilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. Senofilcon A: contact lens |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs | CooperVision Inc. | (925) 621-3761 | javega@coopervision.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009216 | Myopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
contact lens |
|
Lens fit, horizontal centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at 1 week for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal |
| 1 Week |
| Vertical Centration | Lens fit, vertical centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at baseline for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | Baseline |
| Vertical Centration | Lens fit, vertical centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at 1 week for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | 1 Week |
| Lens Movement | Lens movement assessed for stenfilcon A and senofilcon A at baseline using the following evaluations: extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive. | Baseline |
| Lens Movement | Lens movement assessed for stenfilcon A and senofilcon A at 1 week using the following evaluations: extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive. | 1 Week |
| Visual Acuity | Measurement of visual acuity (VA) for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A assessed at baseline and 1 week using logMAR VA chart. | Baseline and 1 week |
| Lens Surface - Deposition | Lens surface for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | Baseline |
| Lens Surface - Deposition | Lens surface for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | 1 week |
| Lens Surface - Debris | Lens debris for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | Baseline |
| Lens Surface - Debris | Lens debris for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | 1 week |
| Lens Surface - Wettability | Lens wettability for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | Baseline |
| Lens Surface - Wettability | Lens wettability for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | 1 week |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Overall Subjective Score of Lenses | Subjective responses will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, 100=excellent. | A protocol deviation occurred for 1 participant and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Comfort | Subjective responses for comfort will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=causes pain, cannot be tolerated, 100=excellent, cannot be felt. | A protocol deviation occurred for 1 participant and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Dryness | Subjective responses for dryness will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, high levels of dryness, 100=excellent, no dryness. | A protocol deviation occurred for 1 participant and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision | Subjective responses for vision will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn, 100=excellent. | A protocol deviation occurred for 1 participant and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Horizontal Centration | Lens fit, horizontal centration will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at baseline for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Horizontal Centration | Lens fit, horizontal centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at 1 week for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | A protocol deviation occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 1 Week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vertical Centration | Lens fit, vertical centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at baseline for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vertical Centration | Lens fit, vertical centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at 1 week for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal | A protocol deviation occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 1 Week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Movement | Lens movement assessed for stenfilcon A and senofilcon A at baseline using the following evaluations: extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Movement | Lens movement assessed for stenfilcon A and senofilcon A at 1 week using the following evaluations: extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive. | A protocol deviation occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 1 Week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Visual Acuity | Measurement of visual acuity (VA) for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A assessed at baseline and 1 week using logMAR VA chart. | Protocol deviations occurred and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | Baseline and 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Deposition | Lens surface for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Deposition | Lens surface for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | A protocol deviation occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Debris | Lens debris for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Debris | Lens debris for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | A protocol deviation occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Wettability | Lens wettability for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Wettability | Lens wettability for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe | A protocol deviation occurred for 2 participants and therefore resulted in incomplete data sets. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 1 week |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 70 |
| 0 |
| 70 |
| EG001 | Stenfilcon A | Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study. Stenfilcon A: contact lens | 0 | 70 | 0 | 70 |
Not provided
| 1 week |
|
|
| 1 week |
|
|
| 1 week |
|
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly temporal |
|
| Extremely temporal |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly temporal |
|
| Extremely temporal |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly temporal |
|
| Extremely temporal |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly temporal |
|
| Extremely temporal |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly excessive |
|
| Extremely excessive |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly excessive |
|
| Extremely excessive |
|
| Baseline: Low Contrast |
|
|
| 1 week: High Contrast |
|
|
| 1 week: Low Contrast |
|
|
| Mild |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Mild |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Mild |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Mild |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Mild |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Mild |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|