A Clinical Evaluation of the Oxitone Non-invasive Oximeter. Method Comparison Study vs. a Standard Clinical Pulse-oximeter Monitor. A Prospective Open Study
A Clinical Evaluation of the Oxitone Non-invasive Oximeter. Method Comparison Study vs. a Standard Clinical Pulse-oximeter Monitor. A Prospective Open Study
The trial shall assess the accuracy of the Oxitone® 1000 in measuring oxygen saturation, by comparing its measurement to reference devices: non-invasive SpO2 and pulse-rate values determined by a pulse oximeter. A total of approximately 40 subjects: 20 healthy and 20 COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ) patients will be enrolled. These subjects will be enrolled at the medical center pulmonary department and will be recruited from the clinic patient base. The subjects will be represented by male and female adults who optimally cover a range of ethnic backgrounds (skin pigmentation). All testing will be performed in singleton and in a blinded fashion. This study will be conducted with the approval of the medical center ethics committee.
This is a comparison open study with no subject follow-up.
The Oxitone® 1000 oximetry readings are accurate and measure with an acceptable relative absolute difference (RAD) when compared to accepted measurement systems (FDA recognized predicate) the "Reference".
The objectives:
Overview: The trial shall assess the accuracy of the Oxitone® 1000 in measuring oxygen saturation, by comparing its measurement to reference devices: non-invasive SpO2 and pulse-rate values determined by a pulse oximeter. A total of approximately 40 subjects (20 healthy and 20 COPD patients) will be enrolled. These subjects will be enrolled at the medical center pulmonary department and will be recruited from the clinic patient base. The subjects will be represented by male and female adults who optimally cover a range of ethnic backgrounds (skin pigmentation). All testing will be performed in singleton and in a blinded fashion. This study will be conducted with the approval of the medical center ethics committee.This is a comparison open study with no subject follow-up.
Procedure: All instruments will be checked for functionality and battery operational capacity, prior to subject attachment including the data collection system, i.e. the wireless (B.T.) connectivity to P.C. (synchronized bidirectional two channels).
The "Reference" oximeter device shall be set for averaging mode of 12 seconds. Two sensors will be placed simultaneously on the subjects: A standard SpO2 (reference) will be placed on the subject's index finger and the tested Oxitone® 1000 will be placed on the subject's wrist of the same hand.
Methods:: The investigators are to study approximately 40 subjects, both normal, i.e. comparison group and patients with a variety of pulmonary conditions that effect oxygen saturation. The investigators will compare the oxygen saturation of each subject as measured with Oxitone® 1000 device and with the oxygen saturation as measured with calibrated conventional FDA approved pulse oximeter (predicate). The "Reference". No treatment decision will be made utilizing the results of the tested device.
Trial design:
A. Healthy subjects: Spot-check measurements of 20 healthy volunteers simultaneously tested by using Oxitone oximeter and standard fingertip pulse oximeter at stationary state i.e. at sitting and standing positions up to 6 minutes each.
1. A 6-minute.walk: oximetry tests of 20 healthy volunteers simultaneously tested using Oxitone oximeter and standard fingertip pulse oximeter in accordance with the industry (Medical) standards of 6-min walk protocol. Measurements are collected and recorded continuously prior to test, during the test and after 6 minutes the test. The distance of the 6-min walk will be recorded (CRF).
B. COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) subjects
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Alexgu@clalit.org.il+972-522-496934
lshenk@post.tau.ac.il+972-544-876600