Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Robotic telesonography, in which an expert remotely performs sonography in real time, has recently emerged as an opportunity to perform sonography at remote centres. Using a robotic system and an assistant with limited training at the remote site, an expert can manipulate an ultrasound probe and generate images in real-time via an Internet connection. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of robotic telesonography for obstetric and adult and pediatric abdominal imaging in a centre with established sonography services which will be used as a comparator to robotic telesonography.
Lack of trained sonographers in remote communities limits access to sonography for many patients. As a result, patients must travel or be transported to secondary and tertiary care centres, which often delays diagnosis and subsequent treatment, creates burdens for patients and their families, and increases healthcare costs. Robotic telesonography, in which an expert remotely performs sonography in real time, has recently emerged as an opportunity to provide sonography regardless of the availability of a skilled operator at the site. Studies primarily originating in Europe have demonstrated robotic telesonography in abdominal, pelvic, obstetric, and cardiologic applications in adults. However, the full potential of robotic telesonography across many imaging applications has yet to be explored, and robotic telesonography has not yet been trialed in Canada. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of robotic telesonography in a centre with established sonography services which will be used as a comparator to robotic telesonography. Approximately 30 patients will be recruited for each substudy (obstetric, adult abdominal, and pediatric abdominal). All patients will receive both conventional and robotic scans in a crossover design. The sonographer performing the scan will be asked to complete a data collection form which will collect information about duration of the exam and any challenges encountered. Following the completion of both scans, the patient-site assistant will provide a questionnaire to the patient (or for children, a parent/guardian of the patient) regarding his/her experience with the system. A physician will review images generated using either the robotic telesonography or conventional sonography systems and report findings on a standardized reporting form.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic telesonography compared to conventional sonography | Experimental | All participants will receive two imaging studies: (1) Robotic telesonography using the MELODY Patient System (AdEchoTech) in conjunction with the SonixTablet ultrasound system (BK Ultrasound, formerly Ultrasonix), and (2) conventional sonography using EPIQ 5 (Philips) or LOGIQ E9 (GE Healthcare). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic telesonography (MELODY Patient System, AdEchoTech) | Device | Robotic telesonography using the MELODY Patient System (AdEchoTech) in conjunction with the SonixTablet ultrasound system (BK Ultrasound, formerly Ultrasonix). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic performance of robotic telesonography, expressed as the concordance of measurements and concordance of findings visualized with robotic telesonography using conventional sonography as a reference standard. | Research images will be interpreted within 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of robotic telesonography exams relative to conventional sonography | 1 day | |
| Acceptability of the robotic telesonography experience to patients measured using Likert items | 1 day | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott J. Adams | Contact | 306-373-7198 | scott.adams@usask.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul S. Babyn, MDCM, FRCPC | University of Saskatchewan | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saskatoon Medical Imaging | Recruiting | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | S7K 0W2 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional sonography (EPIQ 5, Philips or LOGIQ E9, GE Healthcare) | Device | Conventional sonography using EPIQ 5 (Philips) or LOGIQ E9 (GE Healthcare) ultrasound systems. |
|
| Acceptability of the robotic telesonography system to remote users (sonographers) and patient-site assistants measured using Likert items |
| 1 day |
| Royal University Hospital | Recruiting | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | S7N 0W8 | Canada |
|
| The Ultrasound Centre | Recruiting | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada |
|