Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39-2013 SubStudy | Other Identifier | University of Florida |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Technical issues preventing recruitment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT), originally known for its role in inducing uterine contractions has been shown to be involved in many of the social capacities that seem to change with age, such as emotion detection and identification, enhanced social memory, empathy, and trust. Thus, age-related changes in the OXT system may underlie differences between young and older adults in socioemotional functioning. Research on the effects of oxytocin in aging is very scarce; therefore, the purpose of this research project is to determine the effects of oxytocin on socioemotional aging. The aim of this research is to examine the behavioral and neural effects of OXT on decisions of trust in social interactions, perceptions of facial trustworthiness, the ability to read faces, and levels of empathy with other people in samples of young and older adults.
Overview: This study has three parts: An initial screening visit and two study visits. All visits to be conducted at the Institute on Aging at the University of Florida.
Screening Visit - Screening: Together with the information obtained in the phone screening, the main purpose of the screening visit is to find out if the participants are eligible to participate in the study.
Study Visits -
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Spray | Experimental | This group will receive the single dose of 24 IU oxytocin, self-administered intranasally (IN). Prior to administration a saliva sampling will be done. Afterwards, they will participate in the Choices Study during EEG and eye tracking recording. |
|
| Placebo spray | Placebo Comparator | This group will receive the single dose of 24 IU saline, self-administered intranasally (IN). Prior to administration a saliva sampling will be done. Afterwards, they will participate in the Choices Study during EEG and eye tracking recording. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Spray | Drug | This group will receive the single dose of 24 IU oxytocin, self-administered intranasally (IN). Prior to administration a saliva sampling will be done. Afterwards, they will participate in the Choices Study during EEG and eye tracking recording. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The change in choices task between baseline and at week 2 | Interactive computer task that determines willingness to give money to a fellow player. | Change between baseline and at week 2 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The change in General Trust Measure Questionnaire between baseline and at week 2 | Participants will work on the 11-item General Trust Measure (General Trust Measure; Rothstein, 2011), which assesses participants' level of trust on a scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. With a total overall score of 77 being the best possible score, and 11 is the worst overall score. | Change between baseline and at week 2 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Natalie C Ebner, PhD | University of Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida | 32611-2250 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo Spray | Drug | This group will receive the single dose of 24 IU placebo, self-administered intranasally (IN). Prior to administration a saliva sampling will be done. Afterwards, they will participate in the Choices Study during EEG and eye tracking recording. |
|
|
| The change in Empathy Quotient Questionnaire between baseline and at week 2 | Participants will fill out a 22-item version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short; Wakabayashi et al., 2006), on a scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. With a total overall score of 110 being the best possible score, and 22 is the worst overall score. This measure assesses empathy, as the drive to identify emotions and thoughts in others and to respond to these with an appropriate emotion. | Change between baseline and at week 2 |
| The change in Trait Meta-Mood Scale Questionnaire between baseline and at week 2 | Participants will respond to seven items from two subscales (Attention to feelings; Clarity of feelings) of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS; Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, Turvey, & Palfai, 1995), as a measure of emotional attention and clarity, using a scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. With a total overall score of 35 being the best possible score, and 7 is the worst overall score. | Change between baseline and at week 2 |
| The change in Inclusion of Community in the Self Scale Questionnaire between baseline and at week 2 | Participants will respond to a modified version of the Inclusion of Community in the Self Scale (#14-ICS; Mashek, Cannaday, & Tangney, 2007). This measure assesses the connectedness an individual feels to other people. Participants will be presented pictures of two circles with different degrees of overlap (representing different extents of connectedness) and will be told that one circle represents themselves and the other circle represents people of a particular age group (young, older). Participants will be asked to mark the picture that best describes their connectedness with the age group specified. This will be repeated for each of the two age groups, counterbalanced across participants. Participants will select a maximum of one picture per age group. | Change between baseline and at week 2 |
| Gift basket task | Participants are given the choice to give their fellow players either a candy or fruit basket. | Week 2 |
| Donation task | Participants are given the option to donate their reimbursement to a charity. | Week 2 |