Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2014-02497 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| CASE5Y14 | Other Identifier | Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | |
| P30CA043703 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
No bone lesions detected and poor accrual
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial studies dual energy computed tomography (CT) in finding cancer that has spread from the original (primary) tumor to the bone (bone metastases) in patients with cancer. Diagnostic procedures, such as dual energy CT, may help find and diagnose bone metastases and may be more accurate compared to single energy CT alone.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare the accuracy of single energy CT (SECT) with virtual non-calcium (VNC) double energy CT (DECT) to standard SECT alone in the detection of metastatic bone lesions using positron emission tomography (PET)-CT as the reference standard.
OUTLINE:
Computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely used in the evaluation of oncologic patients for initial diagnosis and subsequent disease staging. Detection of bone metastasis on standard CT, however, is limited in sensitivity, particularly in case of osteolytic intramedullary lesions. Recent studies have shown the ability to detect bone marrow edema using CT with the use of a virtual non-calcium (VNC) dual energy CT (DECT) technique. Because bone marrow edema is similar in composition to intramedullary bone metastases (i.e. both are of soft tissue composition as opposed to calcium or fat), VNC DECT may also be helpful in the detection of bone marrow metastasis. Cancer patients obtaining a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) CT and a separate diagnostic CT scan as part of their routine clinical care will be enrolled into the study. The diagnostic CT scan will be performed on a DECT scanner and the images will be reconstructed as SECT images for routine clinical interpretation as well as VNC DECT images. The SECT images alone will be evaluated and scored, and then the VNC DECT images will be added to the SECT images for a second evaluation (consecutive reading session). Multiple readers blinded to the PET-CT findings for detection of bony metastatic disease will participate.
Researchers hypothesize the addition of VNC DECT to SECT will be more accurate in the detection of metastatic bone marrow lesions compared to SECT alone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic (VNC DECT) | Patients undergo CT scans. Additional images will be processed with virtual non-calcium (VNC) dual energy CT (DECT) information. Comparison will be made between images with and without addition of VNC. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| virtual non-calcium dual-energy computed tomography | Radiation | Undergo VNC DECT |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Lesions Present | Number of lesions detected at the 46 designated locations at the time of the VNC DECT | within 30 days of first treatment |
| Number of lesions absent | Number of absent lesions from the 46 designated locations at the time of the VNC DECT | within 30 days of first treatment |
| Confidence in the presence of one or more lesions in that particular anatomic location using a 0-100 point confidence scale | Each location will be correlated with PETCT which will serve as the reference standard. | within 30 days of first treatment |
| Accuracy of VNC DECT | Will be measured using nonparametric estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using methods for clustered data (i.e. multiple locations per patient). ROC area estimates will be constructed for each reader for both SECT alone and DECT as an adjunct to SECT. For each reader, the ROC areas of SECT and DECT plus SECT will be compared using a Wald test; a significance level of 0.05 will be used. Analysis of variance methods for multiple-reader ROC studies will be used. A 95% confidence interval for the difference in ROC areas will be constructed. | within 30 days of first treatment |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cancer patients obtaining a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) CT and a separate diagnostic CT scan as part of their routine clinical care
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Naveen Subhas, MD | Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106-5065 | United States |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 11, 2016 | Jan 17, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| computed tomography | Radiation | Undergo CT without VNC |
|
|