Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Budgetary Issues
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Siemens Medical Solutions | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to establish a more accurate and precise way to image (take pictures of) metastatic bone disease in patients with prostate cancer for staging and monitoring response to therapy. More specifically, the study aims to evaluate the capabilities of dual energy CT as a more precise and accurate tool for staging and monitoring of therapy response in patients with osseous metastases from castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
Bone metastases in prostate cancer patients are a clinical and diagnostic challenge to image. Sometimes very small metastatic bone lesions may only become detectable by imaging in response to therapy due to increased bone deposition during the first three months after therapy. Commonly used imaging tests (such as regular CT or bone scan) are unable to reliably tell the difference between increased bone deposition (therapy response) and growth of the lesion (progressive disease). This diagnostic challenge may have profound negative effects on patient management since it may require additional imaging before an accurate determination of tumor response can be made. An appropriate determination of tumor response is needed for appropriate management of prostate cancer. The investigators anticipate that the new imaging tested in this study (called dual energy CT) may provide additional critical information in this clinical and diagnostic challenge.
Approximately 100 people with prostate cancer and metastatic bone disease will take part in this study. At enrollment, three months, and six months, they will will receive a non-enhanced (without contrast) dual energy CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis before receiving their routine, clinical contrast-enhanced CT scan.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) | Other | This is a single-arm study. Each patient will receive an unenhanced dual energy CT scan followed by a contrast-enhanced scan as part of clinical routine work up. No change in the contrast material injection protocol will be performed for this this study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dual Energy Computed Tomography | Diagnostic Test | The subject's diagnostic scan will be preceded by a not clinically indicated non enhanced dual energy scan. The overall radiation dose to the patient for the first and second acquisition will be twice the radiation dose of a conventional CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. The non enhanced dual energy scan will be repeated during a clinical follow-up after the subject's first three months of enrollment and at a clinical follow-up after six months of enrollment. The clinically-indicated, contrast-enhanced diagnostic scan will be performed according to standard of care. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Reader Performance for Iodine Maps and Fused Images to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Sensitivity of Imaging Approach | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease. | To analyze the feasibility to detect bone metastasis at baseline more accurately, unenhanced bone marrow imaging will be calculated and additional dual energy based, calcium corrected iodine maps will be used to determine a threshold for detection of vital bone metastasis in order to calculate color coded bone maps for risk of presence of bone metastases. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of anaphylactoid reaction to iodinated contrast material
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke University Hospital | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) | This is a single-arm study. Each patient will receive an unenhanced dual energy CT scan followed by a contrast-enhanced scan as part of clinical routine work up. No change in the contrast material injection protocol will be performed for this this study. Dual Energy Computed Tomography: The subject's diagnostic scan will be preceded by a not clinically indicated non enhanced dual energy scan. The overall radiation dose to the patient for the first and second acquisition will be twice the radiation dose of a conventional CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. The non enhanced dual energy scan will be repeated during a clinical follow-up after the subject's first three months of enrollment and at a clinical follow-up after six months of enrollment. The clinically-indicated, contrast-enhanced diagnostic scan will be performed according to standard of care. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Due to the complexity and challenges in spatial resolution of clinical CT images, the intended analysis failed to differentiate between normal and abnormal bone marrow changes which precluded an accurate analysis of treatment effects. A consensus decision was made to stop recruitment until technical challenges have been solved.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) | This is a single-arm study. Each patient will receive an unenhanced dual energy CT scan followed by a contrast-enhanced scan as part of clinical routine work up. No change in the contrast material injection protocol will be performed for this this study. Dual Energy Computed Tomography: The subject's diagnostic scan will be preceded by a not clinically indicated non enhanced dual energy scan. The overall radiation dose to the patient for the first and second acquisition will be twice the radiation dose of a conventional CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. The non enhanced dual energy scan will be repeated during a clinical follow-up after the subject's first three months of enrollment and at a clinical follow-up after six months of enrollment. The clinically-indicated, contrast-enhanced diagnostic scan will be performed according to standard of care. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
up to 3 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) | This is a single-arm study. Each patient will receive an unenhanced dual energy CT scan followed by a contrast-enhanced scan as part of clinical routine work up. No change in the contrast material injection protocol will be performed for this this study. Dual Energy Computed Tomography: The subject's diagnostic scan will be preceded by a not clinically indicated non enhanced dual energy scan. The overall radiation dose to the patient for the first and second acquisition will be twice the radiation dose of a conventional CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. The non enhanced dual energy scan will be repeated during a clinical follow-up after the subject's first three months of enrollment and at a clinical follow-up after six months of enrollment. The clinically-indicated, contrast-enhanced diagnostic scan will be performed according to standard of care. |
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the complexity and challenges in spatial resolution of clinical CT images, the intended analysis failed to differentiate between normal and abnormal bone marrow changes which precluded an accurate analysis of treatment effects. A consensus decision was made to stop recruitment until technical challenges have been solved.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Daniele Marin | Duke University | 919-684-7366 | daniele.marin@duke.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 10, 2016 | Oct 6, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Specificity of Imaging Approach | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Accuracy of Imaging Approach | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Reader Performance for Iodine Maps and Fused Images to Diagnose Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Primary | Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Primary | Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Primary | Reader Performance for Iodine Maps and Fused Images to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Primary | Sensitivity of Imaging Approach | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Primary | Specificity of Imaging Approach | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Primary | Accuracy of Imaging Approach | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease. | To analyze the feasibility to detect bone metastasis at baseline more accurately, unenhanced bone marrow imaging will be calculated and additional dual energy based, calcium corrected iodine maps will be used to determine a threshold for detection of vital bone metastasis in order to calculate color coded bone maps for risk of presence of bone metastases. | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Reader Performance for Iodine Maps and Fused Images to Diagnose Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| Secondary | Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes | Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients | Data not collected due to technical issues. | Posted | Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes) |
|
|
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 0 |
| 7 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |