Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compares the effect of nebulized lidocaine and lidocaine spray in patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. The investigators evaluate the success rate of the procedure between two methods.
This is a randomized-controlled trial in the patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. The patients are randomized by computer into two arms: nebulized lidocaine and lidocaine spray. Both drugs are applied 15-20 minutes prior the prior the procedure. Only one endoscopist participate in this study. After the procedure finishes, the investigators evaluate the outcome and satisfaction of patients and endoscopist.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine Spray | Active Comparator | 20 puffs of 10% Lidocaine spray |
|
| Nebulized Lidocaine | Active Comparator | 2.5 mL of 10% Lidocaine |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine Spray | Drug | 5 puffs of 10% Lidocaine spray is administered every 5 minutes for 4 times. Then the patient is undergone procedure 5 minutes later. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Topical and Nebulized Anesthesia | Both nurse anesthetist and endoscopist evaluate difficulty during the procedure and demand for additional sedative drugs using numeric scale | 90 min |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction | Satisfaction is evaluated using Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) | 90 min |
| Operator Satisfaction | Satisfaction is evaluated using Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Withdrawal or termination criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papiroon Noitasaeng, RN | Contact | 66(81)4930935 | papiroonnoi@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Papiroon Noitasaeng, RN | Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital | Recruiting | Bangkoknoi | Bangkok | 10700 | Thailand |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7324824 | Background | Korttila K, Tarkkanen J, Tarkkanen L. Comparison of laryngotracheal and ultrasonic nebulizer administration of lidocaine in local anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981 Apr;25(2):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01628.x. | |
| 9167371 | Background | Dhir V, Swaroop VS, Vazifdar KF, Wagle SD. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia without intravenous sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;16(1):10-1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Nebulized Lidocaine | Drug | The patient receives 2.5 mL of 10% lidocaine is used by nebulizer under oxygen flow 6-7 LPM for 15 minutes prior the procedure. |
|
|
| 30 min |