Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background and aims: Glidescope and Airtraq were designed to facilitate intubation and to improve teaching intubation. The investigators want to find their efficacy in normal airway, tongue edema and face-to-face orotracheal intubation models by novice personal.
Material and Methods: After Kocaeli Human Researches Ethics Committee approval, thirty six medical students who were on the beginning of their third year were enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation of one of these devices, they attempted to intubate an adult manikin in three different airway models in a random order; first in normal airway, second, tongue edema and finally, in an entrapped manikin by face-to-face approach with Glidescope or Airtraq. Intubation attempts, insertion and intubation times, success rates, Cormack-Lehane grades, need of maneuvers of these devices were recorded.
Trauma victims mostly had to be intubated at the scene of the area with the paramedics. In a suspect of a cervical trauma, patients must be intubated with the least movement. Videolaryngoscopic techniques had several advantages at this condition. We want to investigate which can be used easily by novice personnel.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| normal airway | Active Comparator | İntubation with glidescope or airtraq in normal airway |
|
| tongue edema | Active Comparator | intubation with glidescope or airtraq in tongue edema simulation |
|
| face-to-face | Active Comparator | intubation with glidescope or airtraq in face-to-face intubation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glidescope | Device | Manikin was intubated by different novice personal with glidescope videolaryngoscope |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| intubation success rates | We recorded the first and total intubation success rates of the intubation with one of these devices | 5 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| intubation time | from the handling of the device till viewing the endotracheal tube entering the vocal cords | 5 minutes |
| Esophageal intubation | is there an esophageal intubation occurred while inserting the tube or not |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zehra I ARSLAN, Doctor | Anesthesiology and Reanimation | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Aug 29, 2016 | |
| Reset | Oct 20, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2016 | Oct 20, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Airtraq | Device | Pediatric manikin was intubated by novice personal with airtraq |
|
| 5 minutes |
| need of optimisation maneuvers | do we need an optimization maneuver while intubating or while viewing the glottis or not | 5 minutes |