Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Trauma victims had to be intubated at the scene of area in different conditions. Face-to-face intubation in an entrapped patient is one of these situations. The investigators want to compare the efficacy of Glidescope, Airtraq and Fastrach in simulating face-ro-face intubation in adult patients aged between 18-60 years.
The investigators record the demographic and the airway data of the patients (thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mallampati score, mandibula protrusions, interincisor distance..etc). The hemodynamic data of the patients baseline preoperatively, after induction, after insertion of the device, after intubation, and 2 minutes intervals after intubation during the ten minutes. Cormack-Lehane grade of the videolaryngoscopes, insertion time, intubation time, need of optimisation maneuvers, mucosal damage, teeth and tongue damage, postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia were recorded.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| face-to-face intubation of Glidescope | Active Comparator | patients were intubated using glidescope by face-to-face approach |
|
| face-to-face intubation with Airtraq | Active Comparator | patients were intubated using the Airtraq by face-to-face approach |
|
| face-to-face intubation with fastrach | Active Comparator | patients were intubated using the Fastrach by face-to-face approach |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glidescope | Device | videolaryngoscope used for endotracheal intubation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| intubation time | 2 minutes | elapsing between the handling of the device till intubation 2 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| mucosal damage | 1 minute after removal | blood on the device after removal 1 minute |
| postoperative minor complications sore troat, teeth damage, tongue damage, desaturation, hoarseness, disphagia |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zehra I ARSLAN, Doctor | Anesthesiology and Reanimation | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Aug 29, 2016 | |
| Reset | Oct 20, 2016 | |
| Release | Feb 2, 2017 | |
| Reset | Mar 22, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2016 | Oct 20, 2016 | |||
| Feb 2, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Airtraq | Device | videolaryngoscope used for endotracheal intubation |
|
| Fastrach | Device | intubating laryngeal mask airway used for blind endotracheal intubation |
|
30 minutes after extubation
| sore troat, teeth damage, tongue damage, desaturation, hoarseness, disphagia 30 minutes |
| need of optimisation maneuvers | during 15 minutes while intubation | chandy, side-to-side, handling force, up-down, reinserting 15 minutes |
| hemodynamic changes (mean arteriial pressure) | mmHg | entübation and after 15 minutes |
| Mar 22, 2017 |