Stimulation Evaluation for Neuromodulation Sensory Effects
Stimulation Evaluation for Neuromodulation Sensory Effects
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how healthy adults experience low-level electrical stimulation delivered through the study device. This study is not intended to treat a medical condition.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the study stimulation comfortable and well tolerated? What sensations do participants notice during stimulation? Can participants tell the difference between active stimulation and sham stimulation?
Researchers will compare active stimulation with sham stimulation. Sham stimulation uses the same study procedures but does not deliver the study stimulation. This comparison will help researchers understand whether sensations are caused by stimulation rather than the study setting or expectations.
Participants will:
Receive brief sessions of active and sham stimulation using the study device. Report sensations, discomfort, or other effects during and after each session. Complete questionnaires or other assessments about their experience with stimulation.
The information from this study will help researchers select stimulation settings and procedures for future studies.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
epilepsy@umn.edu763-807-1858
SENSE is a single-site, acute, sham-controlled study in healthy adult volunteers. The study will evaluate the tolerability and sensory effects of low-intensity Intersectional Short-Pulse (ISP) stimulation delivered using the study system. ISP stimulation uses brief electrical pulses distributed across multiple electrode contacts to produce a focused electrical field in the intended target region.
This study is not intended to treat any medical condition. Its purpose is to characterize how healthy adults experience study stimulation and to inform safe stimulation settings and study procedures for future clinical investigations.
Each participant will complete active ISP stimulation and sham stimulation conditions. During sham stimulation, the study procedures will be similar, but the therapeutic stimulation will not be delivered. Comparing active and sham conditions will help researchers understand whether reported sensations are related to stimulation rather than the study setting or participants' expectations.
The primary objective is to assess tolerability of active ISP stimulation. Tolerability assessments will include participant-reported sensations and discomfort, the intensity at which stimulation is first perceived, and the highest stimulation level that remains acceptable to the participant. Researchers will also document any stimulation-related symptoms or other adverse events.
Secondary objectives are to characterize the type, location, intensity, and consistency of sensations associated with ISP stimulation and to assess whether participants can distinguish active stimulation from sham stimulation. Researchers may evaluate whether responses remain stable across repeated stimulation sessions or stimulation settings.
Exploratory assessments may include recordings or measures of brain activity, muscle activity, and autonomic responses during stimulation, when applicable. These assessments may help characterize physiologic effects associated with active and sham stimulation and support selection of stimulation parameters for future studies.
Information from SENSE will support the development of safe, tolerable, and practical ISP stimulation procedures before evaluating the technology in people with epilepsy.