Bet You Can't Eat Just One: Testing the Abuse Liability of Hyper-palatable Foods
Bet You Can't Eat Just One: Testing the Abuse Liability of Hyper-palatable Foods
The study will conduct a laboratory study designed to evaluate the rewarding and addictive properties of hyper-palatable foods (HPF), using potato chips as the food stimulus/sample HPF.
A within-subjects, double-blind, randomized crossover design will be used to test the abuse liability of a commonly consumed hyper-palatable food (HPF; potato chips) in controlled laboratory conditions, compared to a negative (non-HPF) control and modified doses (Aim 1). In alignment with FDA requirements, the study will randomize participants to complete four study sessions in one of four mixed orders to counterbalance the ordering of food stimuli across participants. One food will be assessed per session. Abuse liability tests will consist of an acute dose effects comparison to evaluate differences in acute rewarding effects, and a test of HPF reinforcing effects via a self-administration task and behavioral economic food purchase task. Participants will be community members who report high dietary intake of potato chips (HPF stimulus in the study), and do not have substance use disorder or eating disorders, which may present confounds.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
tfazzino@ku.edu785-864-0062
cashpetree@ku.edu615-999-5677
tfazzino@ku.edu785-864-0062