Hyperventilation Effects on Bodily Self-Consciousness
Hyperventilation Effects on Bodily Self-Consciousness
This study examines how voluntary fast, deep breathing (hyperventilation) affects the way healthy adults perceive their own body. Participants wear a virtual-reality (VR) headset and see a virtual body; a glowing halo around it either pulses exactly in time with their own breathing or is time-shifted. During the study, breathing, heart activity, blood-oxygen level, the carbon-dioxide content of exhaled air, and brain activity (EEG, measured non-invasively from the scalp) are recorded continuously, and participants complete questionnaires about their experience.
The aim is to understand whether and how altered breathing changes the interplay between what people see and what they feel inside their body, and thereby the sense of being located within one's own body. The study uses a 2×2 within-subjects design crossing Breathing (normal vs. hyperventilation) with Visual synchrony (synchronous vs. asynchronous), with the asynchronous and normal-breathing conditions serving as within-subject controls.
No medication is administered and no medical device is being tested; the instruments used serve only for monitoring and measurement. Participation involves a screening visit (including a short, ~5-minute guided-hyperventilation tolerance test) and an experimental visit.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
parsa.yousefi@unifr.ch+41 26 308 16 03
Background and rationale. Bodily self-consciousness (BSC) - the sense of owning a body and being located within it - depends on integrating exteroceptive (e.g., visual) and interoceptive (e.g., respiratory, cardiac) signals. Voluntary hyperventilation induces marked interoceptive and physiological changes and can alter states of consciousness. This study investigates whether hyperventilation modulates the visually driven manipulation of BSC, using a respiratory-visual full-body illusion.
Design. Single-centre experimental study with a 2x2 within-subjects design crossing Breathing (normal vs. voluntary paced hyperventilation) and Visual synchrony (a virtual body whose surrounding luminous halo is modulated synchronously vs. asynchronously with the participant's real-time respiration, recorded via a respiratory belt). The block order is fixed, with the normal-breathing block always preceding the hyperventilation block for safety and physiological reasons; within each block, the order of the synchronous and asynchronous VR exposures is randomised across participants from a computer-generated permuted-block list prepared before enrolment. The asynchronous and normal-breathing conditions serve as within-subject controls.
Intervention. Voluntary, guided paced hyperventilation is delivered as four cycles of approximately 10 minutes of deepened breathing under audio guidance (including a sustained-hyperventilation window for EEG), with continuous physiological monitoring: end-tidal CO2 (capnography), pulse oximetry (SpO2 and heart rate), ECG, and direct observation by trained study staff. After each breathing cycle, participants view for about 2 minutes a virtual body (avatar) positioned about 2 m ahead and seen from behind, in a first-person perspective, with the halo modulated synchronously or asynchronously with breathing. A normal, quiet-breathing condition in the same VR environment serves as the comparison.
Procedures. The study comprises two visits: (1) a screening visit with informed consent, health-history review, baseline physiology, and a short (~5-minute) VR-guided hyperventilation familiarisation/tolerance test; and (2) an experimental visit (~188 minutes) with the full protocol. A urine pregnancy test is performed at screening for participants of childbearing potential. Safety is governed by predefined tiered stop criteria and a recovery/discharge checklist, with an on-site emergency physician available for escalation.
No medicinal product is administered and no medical device is under investigation; all instruments are used within their intended purpose for monitoring and measurement. The study is an "other clinical trial" under Swiss law (Chapter 4 ClinO), risk category B, reviewed by the Cantonal Ethics Committee Bern (BASEC 2026-01385).
parsa.yousefi@unifr.ch+41 26 308 16 03