Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis: Comparing Integrated, Standard Medical, and Ayurvedic Care
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis: Comparing Integrated, Standard Medical, and Ayurvedic Care
This study is a single-center, three-arm, open-label randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effectiveness of integrated care, standard medical care, and Ayurvedic care in adults with early knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-II). Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of pain, functional limitation, and reduced quality of life, and current management often provides incomplete symptom relief. Although conventional medical and Ayurvedic interventions are widely used in clinical practice, comparative evidence evaluating these treatment approaches individually and in combination remains limited.
A total of 300 participants aged 30-65 years with primary knee osteoarthritis will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard medical care, Ayurvedic care, or integrated care. The standard medical care group will receive oral paracetamol, topical diclofenac spray, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and superficial heat or cold therapy. The Ayurvedic care group will receive Trayodashang Guggulu, Ashwagandha Churna, Janubasti therapy, and topical application of Mahanarayana Taila. The integrated care group will receive Trayodashang Guggulu, Ashwagandha Churna, topical diclofenac spray, and portable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Participants will be followed for 24 weeks.
Primary outcome measures include changes in knee pain intensity, knee osteoarthritis symptoms, knee joint surface temperature, and gait kinematic parameters. Secondary outcome measures include changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of integrated care, standard medical care, and Ayurvedic care in the management of early knee osteoarthritis.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
drniteshgonnade9@gmail.com91 9530199967
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most prevalent chronic musculoskeletal disorders and a leading cause of pain, disability, reduced mobility, and impaired quality of life worldwide. Conventional medical management primarily focuses on reducing pain and improving function through pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, whereas Ayurvedic management utilizes a holistic approach incorporating herbal medications and external therapeutic procedures. Although both treatment approaches are widely practiced, comparative evidence evaluating conventional medical care, Ayurvedic care, and an integrated treatment approach remains limited. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of these three treatment strategies in individuals with early knee osteoarthritis.
This study is a single-center, three-arm, open-label randomized controlled trial in which 300 participants aged 30-65 years with primary knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-II) will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard medical care, Ayurvedic care, or integrated care. Participants will be followed for 24 weeks after randomization. Baseline assessments will include demographic characteristics, clinical examination, radiographic evaluation, and laboratory investigations.
Participants allocated to the Standard Medical Care group will receive oral paracetamol, topical diclofenac spray, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and superficial heat or cold therapy.
Participants allocated to the Ayurvedic Care group will receive Trayodashang Guggulu, Ashwagandha Churna, Janubasti therapy, and topical application of Mahanarayana Taila.
Participants allocated to the Integrated Care group will receive Trayodashang Guggulu, Ashwagandha Churna, topical diclofenac spray, and portable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
The primary objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the three treatment approaches in reducing knee pain, improving knee osteoarthritis symptoms, reducing joint inflammation, and improving gait. Primary outcome measures include changes in knee pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), knee osteoarthritis symptoms assessed using the CRD Pune version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee joint surface temperature assessed using infrared thermography, and gait kinematic parameters assessed using three-dimensional gait analysis. Outcome assessments will be performed at baseline and during follow-up according to the study schedule.
Secondary outcome measures include changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) to evaluate systemic inflammation associated with the three treatment approaches.
The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of integrated care, standard medical care, and Ayurvedic care in improving pain, physical function, joint inflammation, gait, and quality of life among individuals with early knee osteoarthritis. The results may contribute to the development of evidence-based integrative treatment strategies for the management of early knee osteoarthritis.
drshobanpgimer@gmail.com91 8437726777
drniteshgonnade9@gmail.com91 9530199967
drshobanpgimer@gmail.com91 8437726777