Comparison of Two MOdalities of VEntilation on the Occurrence of Respiratory Complications During Inhalational Anaesthetic Induction in Children: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
Comparison of Two MOdalities of VEntilation on the Occurrence of Respiratory Complications During Inhalational Anaesthetic Induction in Children: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
Induction of anesthesia by inhalation is the most common method of induction (70% in France) for young children admitted for non-emergency surgery. It has the advantage of not requiring an intravenous line.
Serious respiratory adverse events such as laryngospasm or bronchospasm remain common in young children during anesthesia induction (approximately 4%) and can reach up to 30% when mild respiratory adverse events (coughing, desaturation < 95%, airway obstruction) are included.
Traditionally, inhalation induction is performed under spontaneous ventilation using the anesthesia ventilator circuit. However, modern ventilators offer the option of applying positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support ventilation (PSV). Several physiological studies suggest that the use of PEEP + PSV during anesthesia may help maintain airway patency, minute ventilation, and functional residual capacity (FRC).
Our hypothesis is that administering PEEP + PSV at the time of induction may reduce the risk of respiratory complications.
The primary objective is to demonstrate that induction of anesthesia using PEP + PSV, compared with induction of anesthesia under spontaneous ventilation, reduces the risk of adverse respiratory events in children requiring general anesthesia with planned inhalational induction.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria :
florent.baudin@chu-lyon.fr+00334 72 12 97 35
clarisse.saunier@chu-lyon.fr+0033427856264
Eloise.cercueil@chu-lyon.fr+00334 27 85 52 48
florent.baudin@chu-lyon.fr+00334 72 12 97 35