External Versus Powered Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy, Both With Intraoperative Mitomycin C, for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Randomized Comparative Study
Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction causes persistent tearing because tears cannot drain normally from the eye into the nose. The purpose of this randomized study was to compare two operations used to restore tear drainage: external dacryocystorhinostomy, performed through a small skin incision near the inner corner of the eye, and powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, performed through the nose using an endoscope and powered instruments, with mitomycin C applied during surgery to reduce scar formation.
Participants were assigned to the two surgical groups using a pre-generated randomization list. Recruitment was completed after 60 participants had been enrolled, resulting in 30 participants in each group. Participants were followed for 12 months after surgery.
The main outcomes were whether the newly created tear drainage opening remained open and whether tearing symptoms improved. Additional assessments included postoperative symptom severity, patient satisfaction, surgical complications, cosmetic concerns related to the external scar, and willingness to undergo the same procedure again.
Bioethics Committee at the Military Chamber of Physicians in Warsaw
Endo-nasal Endoscopic DCR and External-DCR in Primary Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction