The aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment patterns after relapsing on platform disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in terms of proportions of patients who remain on platform DMTs or escalate to high-efficacy DMTs, as well as time to switching DMTs after relapse. Clinical effectiveness was characterized by comparing treatment failure rates in patients who escalate to high-efficacy DMTs versus those who remain on platform DMTs following initial relapse.
Inclusion criteria:
Patients in the Base Sample were required to meet the following eligibility criteria:
Incident claim for a platform oral or injectable DMT in the patient identification period (Mar 28, 2017 - Jul 31, 2023).
No claim for a different DMT used for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) on the treatment initiation date.
≥18 years of age on treatment initiation date.
≥2 outpatient medical claims (at least 30 days apart) with a diagnosis code for MS (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] code: G35) in any position, with the first claim occurring in the 12 months prior to the treatment initiation date and the second claim up to 6 months after treatment initiation date, or ≥1 inpatient claim with a diagnosis of MS in the first position in the 12 months prior to or on treatment initiation date.
≥1 relapse recorded after ≥3 months of persistent use of initial treatment and during period of persistence on initial treatment.
o Index relapse date is the start date of earliest qualifying relapse episode in the initial treatment period.
Continuous healthcare plan enrollment for ≥12 months prior to treatment initiation date and ≥12 months after index relapse date.
Patients in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 included patients meeting the following criteria:
Included in Base Sample.
≥1 claim for a platform oral, platform injectable, or high-efficacy DMT during the switch eligibility period (12-month period after index relapse date).
o For the high-efficacy DMT patients, index treatment date is the date of the first claim for a high-efficacy DMT during the switch eligibility period. For patients who remain on the initial treatment or switch to another DMT, the index treatment date is the date of the claim for the initial treatment that falls in the exposure set and meets matching criteria.
Continuous healthcare plan enrollment and persistent use of index DMT for ≥6 months after index treatment date.
Exclusion criteria:
• Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria.
Adult patients with MS who relapsed on a platform oral or injectable DMT in real-world practice between March 28, 2017 and July 31, 2023.
A subcohort of the Base Sample. Patients with platform oral or injectable DMT as initial treatment who remained on initial oral DMT (InODMT), switched from platform oral to another platform oral DMT (POPO), switched from platform oral to platform injectable DMT (POPI), remained on initial injectable DMT (InIDMT), switched from platform injectable to another platform injectable DMT (PIPI), or switched from platform injectable to platform oral DMT (PIPO).
A subcohort of the Base Sample. Patients who escalated from platform oral to high-efficacy DMT (POHE) or escalated from platform injectable to high-efficacy DMT (PIHE).
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, United States
A Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Anti-CD20 Maintenance Versus De-Escalation Strategy In Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Participants Preferences to Disease Modifying Agents in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Condition
Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Determination Evaluating Real Differences After TimE
Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation Approaches for RRMS
Escalation vs. Induction Therapy Strategy in Patients With Early-Onset MS After Age 50
Observational Study to Characterize Real-world Clinical Outcomes With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Discontinuation of Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Strategies for Adaptive Follow-up and Evaluation - Guiding Use of Indicators for De-Escalation in Multiple Sclerosis