The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether an anatomical prefabricated healing abutment (AHA) improves tissue preservation and clinical outcomes following immediate implant placement after tooth extraction in adults. Although immediate implant placement is a well-established treatment for replacing missing teeth, healing can result in changes to the surrounding bone and soft tissues that may affect the esthetic appearance, function, and long-term stability of the implant-supported restoration. This study will compare an anatomical healing abutment, designed to mimic the natural tooth emergence profile and support peri-implant tissues during healing, with a conventional healing abutment. The primary objectives are to determine whether the AHA better preserves soft tissue contours and alveolar bone, improves implant positioning accuracy and tissue stability during healing, and differs from a conventional healing abutment in complications or adverse events. Eligible participants will be adults requiring extraction of a hopeless tooth in the posterior maxilla or mandible who are suitable candidates for immediate implant placement. Following tooth extraction and implant placement, participants will receive either an anatomical prefabricated healing abutment or a conventional healing abutment and will return for scheduled follow-up visits over approximately 12 months to assess healing, implant stability, and changes in the surrounding hard and soft tissues. Researchers will collect clinical measurements, digital intraoral scans, photographs, and radiographic images throughout the study. Additional research imaging will be used to generate three-dimensional models to measure tissue volume changes and implant position accuracy. Specialized software will compare changes between the two groups over time. Safety will be evaluated by monitoring participants for complications, discomfort, inflammation, implant-related problems, and other adverse events throughout follow-up. All procedures will be performed by trained dental professionals using established clinical protocols. The results may improve understanding of how healing abutment design influences tissue preservation after immediate implant placement and help optimize future implant therapy by supporting better functional, esthetic, and long-term outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Those who appear to qualify will have a CBCT scan taken with an open bite and proper retractions of the cheek, lips, and tongue (standard of care), and the following inclusion criteria, based on the CBCT results, must be present in order for the subject to be fully enrolled in the study:
lmezzomo@uic.edu312-996-3535
Surgeon
Participants assigned to the experimental group will receive a prefabricated anatomical healing abutment (AHA) following immediate implant placement after tooth extraction. The AHA is a healing component designed to better reproduce the natural emergence profile of the extracted tooth and provide anatomical support to the surrounding peri-implant soft tissues during the healing period. After placement of the dental implant, the anatomical prefabricated healing abutment will be connected to the implant and maintained throughout the initial healing phase until the definitive implant-supported restoration is provided according to standard clinical procedures. The intervention is intended to evaluate whether maintaining a more natural tissue contour during healing improves preservation of peri-implant soft tissue volume and stability compared with a conventional healing abutment. Participants will undergo routine clinical follow-up evaluations to measure changes in the soft tissues.
Participants assigned to the control group will receive a conventional healing abutment following immediate implant placement after tooth extraction. The conventional healing abutment represents the standard approach commonly used during the implant healing phase and is designed to allow the surrounding soft tissues to heal and form an appropriate contour around the implant site before placement of the definitive implant-supported restoration. Following implant placement, the conventional healing abutment will be connected to the implant and maintained during the initial healing period according to standard clinical protocols. Participants will undergo the same follow-up schedule and evaluations as the experimental group. Data collected during the 12-month follow-up period will be used to compare changes in peri-implant soft tissue contour, tissue volume preservation, bone remodeling, implant stability, and other clinical outcomes between the control and test groups.
meghand4@uic.edu312-996-7226
wdpolido@iu.edu317-922-5835
Immediate Implants With Customized Abutments
Dimensional Changes of Peri-implant Tissue in Immediate Implants With Individualized Healing Abutments
Effect of Tooth Angulation, Alveolar and Basal Bone Anatomical Characteristics on Soft and Hard Tissue Alterations Around Immediate Implants With Customized Healing Abutment
Midfacial Gingival Margin Changes Following Immediate Implants.
Buccal Soft Tissue Contour Changes After Immediate Implant Placement with or Without Connective Tissue Graft
Digital Assessment at Peri-implant Tissues After Immediate Implants With Customized Healing Abutments and Connective Tissue Grafts
Healing of Bone/Soft Tissue to Different Abutment Biomaterials and the Impact on Marginal Bone Loss
Effect of Abutment Configuration on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissue in the Esthetic Zone - Randomized Clinical Trial