Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the time required for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, first-attempt success rates, and airway sealing quality (air leak) during neonatal resuscitation with and without interrupting chest compressions. Standard resuscitation guidelines recommend pausing chest compressions for airway interventions due to the difficulty of inserting devices during physical movement. However, interrupting compressions drops coronary and cerebral perfusion. This study tests whether an LMA can be successfully inserted without pausing compressions in a high-fidelity simulation model. A total of 32 anesthesiologists participate in this randomized, crossover simulation study using a high-fidelity neonatal manikin. Participants perform two different scenarios in a randomly allocated order: Scenario A involves standard LMA insertion with interrupted chest compressions, and Scenario B involves LMA insertion during continuous, uninterrupted chest compressions. The primary objective is to determine if performing the procedure under continuous chest compressions affects the procedure time, clinical success, air leak volumes, or the perceived workload and stress of the practitioners.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Scenario A -> B) | Experimental | Participants perform traditional LMA insertion with interrupted chest compressions first (Scenario A), followed by a 10-minute washout period, and then perform LMA insertion under continuous chest compressions (Scenario B). |
|
| Group 2 (Scenario B -> A) | Experimental | Participants perform LMA insertion under continuous chest compressions first (Scenario B), followed by a 10-minute washout period, and then perform traditional LMA insertion with interrupted chest compressions (Scenario A). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size 1 ProSeal™ LMA | Device | Laryngeal Mask Airway used for neonatal ventilation simulation. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| LMA Insertion Time | The time (in seconds) elapsed from the moment the participant picks up the LMA until the device is seated in the anatomical position and the first lung ventilation is achieved. | Periprocedural |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| First-attempt insertion success rate | Percentage of participants succeeding on the first try | Periprocedural |
| Measured Air Leak Volume | Measured Air Leak Volume (L/min) during 1-minute ventilation. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Faculty of Medicine | Kahramanmaraş | Kahramanmaraş | 46100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 minute post-procedure |
| Perceived Procedural Difficulty | Measured via Visual Analogue Scale - VAS, 0 to 10 | Immediate post-procedure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001238 | Asphyxia Neonatorum |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007232 | Infant, Newborn, Diseases |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided