Comparison Of Different Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis (The COMET Study)
Comparison Of Different Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis (The COMET Study)
A head-to-head comparison of two different types of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) - ClotTriever System versus aspiration thrombectomy (including rheolytic thrombectomy) - in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was conducted to determine whether ClotTriever System can improve thrombus clearance rate, reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and enhance the long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT.
Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Early removal of iliofemoral thrombosis by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) may reduce the incidence of PTS. There is currently a lack of research on which device is optimal for thrombus removal. The aim of this study is to conduct a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT), performing a head-to-head comparison of two different types of mechanical thrombectomy devices - ClotTriever System versus aspiration thrombectomy (including rheolytic thrombectomy) - to determine whether ClotTriever System can improve thrombus clearance rate, reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and enhance the long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
niqihong1989@163.com+8615801900772