Comparison Of Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy With Different Access in Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis (The CODA Study)
Comparison Of Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy With Different Access in Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis (The CODA Study)
The study aims to compare the modified approach through ipsilateral deep calf venous access or contralateral femoral venous access with the traditional approach through ipsilateral popliteal venous access for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with distal popliteal vein thrombosis, and determine whether it can achieve similar therapeutic effects as iliofemoral DVT without distal popliteal vein thrombosis.
Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Early removal of iliofemoral thrombosis by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) may reduce the incidence of PTS. In general, PMT is performed through ipsilateral popliteal venous access as a traditional approach. However, the thrombosis in distal popliteal vein cannot be removed. Previous study demonstrated that the residual thrombus may decrease the efficacy of PMT. The study aims to compare the modified approach through ipsilateral deep calf venous access or contralateral femoral venous access with the traditional approach for iliofemoral DVT with distal popliteal vein thrombosis, and determine whether it can achieve similar therapeutic effects as iliofemoral DVT without distal popliteal vein thrombosis. The purpose of this study is to obtain high-level evidence for the endovascular treatment of acute DVT.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
niqihong1989@163.com+8615801900772