Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the present study will be clinical and radio graphical comparison of four basal and compressive implant designs will be installed in the interforamina area of atrophied edentulous mandible and immediately loaded by screw retained mandibular overdenture .
Implant design comparison will be done clinically and radiographically after one and two years of implant loading
Patients will be divided randomly in to 2 equal groups:
Evaluation will be for:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basal implant Group | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive four basal implants placed in the atrophied edentulous mandible. Implants will be immediately loaded using a bar-retained mandibular overdenture. Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be performed to assess implant stability and peri-implant tissue health over the follow-up period.for 3,6,12months intervventions |
|
| Compressive Dental implant | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive four compressive implants placed in the atrophied edentulous mandible. Implants will be immediately loaded using a bar-retained mandibular overdenture. Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be performed to assess implant stability and peri-implant tissue health over the follow-up period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal Dental implant | Device | Placement of four basal dental implants in the atrophied edentulous mandible followed by immediate loading using a bar-retained mandibular overdenture. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peri-implant tissue health | Peri-implant tissue health that will be measured according to mombelli for both groups | Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after implant loading. |
| Marginal bone height changes | Marginal bone height changes will be measured using standardized digital panoramic x-ray for both groups | Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after implant loading. |
| Implant stability | Periotest will evaluate the stability of the implants during implantation for both groups | Baseline, 6 months, and 6 months after implant loading. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
-
mandibular and maxillary alveolar ridges are completely edentulous (2) There is not sufficient bone in the mandibular posterior molar area to place implants and there is a thin ridge anteriorly (3) skeletal class I maxilla-mandibular relationship (4) Devoid o f any systemic disorders related to bone resorptio
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gilan Altonbary, Ass.prof | Mansoura University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of dentistry Mansoura university | Al Mansurah | Egypt |
Totally research information especially clinical study results data step of researh
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Compressive Dental implant | Device | Placement of four compressive dental implants in the atrophied edentulous mandible followed by immediate loading using a bar-retained mandibular overdenture. |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057893 | Immediate Dental Implant Loading |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003758 | Dental Implantation, Endosseous |
| D003757 | Dental Implantation |
| D013516 | Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic |
| D019647 | Oral Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019919 | Prosthesis Implantation |
| D003813 | Dentistry |
| D011476 | Prosthodontics |
Not provided
Not provided