Mechanisms Behind Benefits Framing
Mechanisms Behind Benefits Framing
This study evaluates the effectiveness of different message framings used to encourage uptake of preventive dental check-ups. Patients will be randomized to receive one of several WhatsApp messages offering a full preventive dental check-up, which vary in message length and in how the benefits of the check-up are described.
Patients in this trial will be randomized to one of four conditions. In all conditions, patients will receive a WhatsApp message from a clinic network, encouraging them to schedule a preventive dental check-up. The conditions vary in message length and the specificity of the benefits emphasized. Previous pilot studies run by the investigators suggest that adding health- or appearance-related meaning to preventive dental checkup invitation messages may reduce uptake relative to a basic WhatsApp invitation. The present study is designed to replicate this pattern and explore the mechanism(s) underlying this pattern by isolating the role of message length and the references to benefits. Specifically:
The researchers primarily ask the following research question: Does emphasizing specific benefits in an expanded outreach message affect dental check-up uptake relative to a basic outreach message? The researchers hypothesize that patients receiving the Expanded Specific Benefit Outreach Message will have lower uptake of dental checkups than patients receiving the Basic Outreach Message. The investigators will also assess the roles of message length and language referencing benefits.
Analysis:
The investigators will run ordinary least squares regressions (OLS) with robust standard errors to predict outcome variables.
To test whether emphasizing specific benefits in an expanded outreach message affect uptake relative to a basic outreach message, the investigators will pool (collapse) the four variants of the Expanded Specific Benefit Outreach Message condition into a single treatment indicator and compare outcomes for patients assigned to this pooled condition versus patients assigned to the Basic Outreach Message condition.
In addition, the investigators will estimate a model that includes indicators for each of the four specific-benefit variants and conduct a joint F-test of whether the four variant indicators are jointly equal (i.e., whether outcomes differ across the variants).
The investigators will conduct additional comparisons to understand why the Expanded Specific Benefit Outreach message may reduce uptake relative to the Basic Outreach message. Specifically, the investigators will compare outcomes between the Basic Outreach Message condition versus the Expanded Neutral Outreach Message condition to assess the role of message length. If there is no significant difference between the two treatments, they will be pooled and compared to the Specific Benefit (pooled) treatments. Then the investigators will compare outcomes between the Basic Outreach Message condition versus the Expanded Generic Benefit Outreach Message condition to assess the role of message length and language referencing benefits.
These regressions will be run with and without control variables. Control variables include:
For robustness, the investigators will conduct logit models as well.
The investigators will examine whether the following factors moderate the differences in uptake between the Expanded Specific Benefit Outreach Message condition and Basic Outreach Message condition:
For exploratory purposes, the investigators will look at longer time windows (e.g., 90 days) for dental appointment attendance and will also examine behaviors related to the dental appointments (e.g., cancellation, rescheduling, no-show).
Inclusion Criteria:
Note: The partnering clinic agreed to run the study until a concurrent experiment registered at NCT07121673 is finished. The investigators aim to reach 100,000 patients by then, but the final sample size will vary depending on the actual outreach efforts by the end of the study period.