Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Coercive control (CC) is increasingly recognized as a central component of intimate partner violence (IPV) and a major determinant of victims' health outcomes. While widely integrated into policy and legal frameworks in several countries, CC remains insufficiently explored in the French research context, particularly regarding its clinical and psychopathological dimensions. This gap may limit the identification of victims and the provision of appropriate care.
The present study aims to investigate the association between exposure to coercive control and physical and mental health outcomes among victims of intimate partner violence. By improving the understanding of CC-related health impacts, this research seeks to support better identification of high-risk situations and inform clinical and public health interventions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire arm | Experimental | Participants will complete online questionnaires via the Qualtrics platform |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| questionnaire | Other | Participants will complete online questionnaires via the Qualtrics platform at baseline and at 6 months post-enrollment |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Coercive Control Screening Scale | Measure of Coercive Control Screening Scale (CCSS). Minimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 44. Higher score means worse outcome | Measure of CCSS between inlusion and month 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure of Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD scale) | correlation between HAD scale and CCSS scale. Minimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 42. Higher score means worse outcome | Measure of HHAD scale between inclusion and month 6 |
| Severity of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatima F LE GRIGUER, Principal Investigator | Contact | 00 33 1 49 36 72 38 | fatima.le-griguer@ght-gpne.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| fatima F Le Griguer, psychologist | CHI Robert Balanger of GHT GPNE | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI Robert Ballanger | Aulnay-sous-Bois | ÃŽle-de-France Region | 93600 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Severity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms assessed by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), based on total score and DSM-5 clinical thresholds. Minimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 80. Higher score means worse outcome |
| at inclusion and month 6 |
| International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ). | International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), according to ICD-11 criteria. Minimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 72. Higher score means worse outcome | Inclusion and month 6 |
| Severity of emotional dysregulation | Severity of emotional dysregulation assessed using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - French version (DERS-F). Minimal scale = 36, maximal scale = 180. Higher score means worse outcome | inclusion and month 6 |
| Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) | Health-related quality of life assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), including physical and mental component summary scores. optimal scale more than 40. scale < 40 means worse outcome | inclusion and month 6 |
| Brief Pain Inventory | Pain intensity and functional impact assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). mninimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 10. Higher score means worse outcome | at inclusion and month 6 |
| Coercive Control Scale (CCSS) | Analysis of score distribution on the Coercive Control Scale (CCSS) to determine a clinically relevant threshold for coercive control. Minimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 44. Higher score means worse outcome | inclusion and month 6 |
| Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) | Intimate partner violence assessed using the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST). minimal scale = 0, maximal scale = 16. Higher score means worse outcome | inclusion and month 6 |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |