Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of mandala art therapy on psychological resilience and coping with cancer in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial with a pre-test-post-test design, including intervention and control groups. The study will be conducted between January 2026 and December 2026 with patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. The G.power 3.1.9.7 program was used for sample size calculation. The sample size was determined as 28 individuals in each group, considering equal sample sizes in the experimental and control groups, a 95% confidence interval (type I error 5%), and statistical power of 80% (type II error 20%) with an effect size of d=0.50. However, considering a possible 20% data loss, 35 individuals will be included in each group, resulting in a total sample size of 70 individuals.
Sample selection will be made using sequential sampling according to inclusion criteria. Patients will then be randomly assigned to the experimental group (A) and the control group (B) using block randomization (four-block). First, 15 blocks of four, such as AABB, ABAB, ABBA, BBAA, BABA, BAAB, etc., will be prepared by the researcher and statistician. Individuals will then be divided into two groups according to the prepared list; this process will be repeated continuously until the sample size is complete.
Three data collection forms were used. SPSS 22.00 software package was used for data analysis. Skewness and kurtosis analyses were performed to determine the normality of the data distribution. Frequency (n) and percentage (%) distributions were calculated to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the participants. Independent samples t-test was used to determine the mean differences between two independent groups, dependent samples t-test was used to compare pre- and post-intervention measurements, and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Cohen's d effect size was calculated to evaluate the significance of the difference between groups in terms of the intervention. The statistical significance level was accepted as p<0.05.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| The application of mandala art therapy to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery | Experimental | Colorectal cancer patients |
|
| rutine service operation | Other | Colorectal cancer patients |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandala art therapy | Other | Mandala art therapy was applied to the experimental group in the postoperative period. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Information Form on experimental group | The form includes personal information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, employment status, smoking, and alcohol use; and clinical information such as family history of cancer, loss of life due to cancer, stage of cancer diagnosis, stoma placement, and metastasis status. | 1 day |
| Cognitive Emotional Coping Scale with Cancer pre-test post-test on experimental group | The scale consists of 21 items and 5 sub-dimensions (cognitive avoidance, cognitive re-evaluation, distraction and suppression, optimism and hope, uncontrollable thoughts) and is a 6-point Likert scale. The scale is answered as follows: "Strongly Disagree" (0), "Disagree" (1), "Partially Disagree" (2), "Partially Agree" (3), "Agree" (4), "Strongly Agree" (5) (Appendix-2). The minimum score on the scale is 0 and the maximum score is 105. It is known that as the score on the scale increases, the coping abilities of individuals also increase. | 1 day |
| Short Psychological Resilience Scale pre-test post-test on experimental group | The scale measures psychological resilience. The scale is prepared in a 5-point Likert type and contains 6 items. The scale is answered as follows: "Not suitable at all" (1), "Not suitable" (2), "Somewhat suitable" (3), "Suitable" (4), The answer is "Completely Appropriate" (5). Items 2, 4 and 6 on the scale are reverse coded. A high score on the scale indicates high psychological resilience. | 1 day |
| Patient Information Form on control group | The form includes personal information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, employment status, smoking, and alcohol use; and clinical information such as family history of cancer, loss of life due to cancer, stage of cancer diagnosis, stoma placement, and metastasis status. | 1 day |
| Cognitive Emotional Coping Scale with Cancer pre-test post-test on control group |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pınar YILMAZ EKER | Contact | +90 530 946 89 19 | yilmazpinar20@gmail.com | |
| Ayşegül KAYA İMREK | Contact | +90 507 037 76 65 | aysegulkayagk@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melis BOZOGLU | İstanbul Atlas University | Study Director |
| Pınar YILMAZ EKER | Cumhuriyet University | Principal Investigator |
| Ayşegül KAYA İMREK |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sivas Cumhuriyet University | Recruiting | Sivas | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Doğan, T. (2015). Kısa Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği'nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması Adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Içinde The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being (C. 3, Sayı 1). | ||
| Background | Cwik, J. C., Vaganian, L., Bussmann, S., Labouvie, H., Houwaart, S., Gerlach, A. L., & Kusch, M. (2021). Assessment of coping with cancer-related burdens: psychometric properties of the Cognitive-Emotional Coping with Cancer scale and the German Mini-mental Adjustment to Cancer scale. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research & Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000046 | ||
| 18696313 | Background | Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972. |
Not provided
Not provided
We plan to publish the study in an international journal.
Data will be collected for six months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised conrtolled trial
Not provided
Not provided
This study will utilize a sequential sampling method. Patients will then be randomly assigned to the experimental group (A) and the control group (B) using block randomization (four-block). First, 15 blocks of four, such as AABB, ABAB, ABBA, BBAA, BABA, BAAB, etc., will be prepared by the researcher and statistician. Individuals will then be divided into two groups according to the prepared list; this process will be repeated continuously until the sample size is complete.
| rutine service operation | Other | No additional intervention will be made to the control group; only data collection forms will be applied. |
|
The scale consists of 21 items and 5 sub-dimensions (cognitive avoidance, cognitive re-evaluation, distraction and suppression, optimism and hope, uncontrollable thoughts) and is a 6-point Likert scale. The scale is answered as follows: "Strongly Disagree" (0), "Disagree" (1), "Partially Disagree" (2), "Partially Agree" (3), "Agree" (4), "Strongly Agree" (5) (Appendix-2). The minimum score on the scale is 0 and the maximum score is 105. It is known that as the score on the scale increases, the coping abilities of individuals also increase. |
| 1 day |
| Short Psychological Resilience Scale pre-test post-test on control group | The scale measures psychological resilience. The scale is prepared in a 5-point Likert type and contains 6 items. The scale is answered as follows: "Not suitable at all" (1), "Not suitable" (2), "Somewhat suitable" (3), "Suitable" (4), The answer is "Completely Appropriate" (5). Items 2, 4 and 6 on the scale are reverse coded. A high score on the scale indicates high psychological resilience. | 1 day |
| Cumhuriyet University |
| Study Director |
| Çağla TOPRAK | İstanbul Atlas University | Study Director |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| D001519 | Behavior |