Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRIIRS/SAHS/PT/2024-25/009 | Other Grant/Funding Number | MRIIRS |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compares instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and foam roller therapy in individuals with plantar fasciitis. Both groups receive structured exercises. The study evaluates changes in pain, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, and functional ability after treatment to determine which intervention is more effective for improving symptoms and physical function.
This randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and foam roller therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis. Plantar fasciitis is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by heel pain and reduced functional mobility, often associated with restricted ankle dorsiflexion and plantar fascia tightness.
Participants diagnosed with plantar fasciitis were recruited from a physiotherapy outpatient department and randomly allocated into two intervention groups. Group A received instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applied to the plantar fascia and surrounding soft tissues along with a structured exercise program. Group B received foam roller therapy targeting the plantar fascia region in addition to the same exercise protocol. Both interventions were administered over a defined treatment period under physiotherapist supervision.
The study aimed to compare the effects of these interventions on pain intensity, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, and functional disability related to plantar fasciitis. Measurements were obtained at baseline and after completion of the intervention period. The findings of this study may help identify effective physiotherapy interventions for improving pain and functional outcomes in individuals with plantar fasciitis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | IASTM + Exercise |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | Foam Roller + Exercise |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) | Other | Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applied to the plantar fascia and surrounding soft tissues to improve tissue mobility and reduce pain. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). | Pre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks) |
| Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measured in degrees using a goniometer | Ankle range of motion will be measured in degrees using a universal goniometer. | Pre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks) |
| Health-related quality of life measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire | Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, which evaluates physical and mental health domains. Each domain is scored separately and then transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better health status and quality of life. | Pre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks) |
| Foot pain and disability measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI) | Foot function and disability related to plantar fasciitis were measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire. Each item of the Foot Function Index (FFI) is rated on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain or difficulty and 10 indicates the worst pain or extreme difficulty. Scores for the answered items in each subscale are summed and divided by the maximum possible score for that subscale, and the result is multiplied by 100 to obtain a percentage score (FFI Score = Sum of item scores / Maximum possible score × 100). The scores range from 0% to 100%, where 0% represents no pain or disability and 100% represents maximum pain and disability. Higher scores indicate greater pain, functional limitation, and disability related to foot problems. A total FFI score can be calculated by averaging the three subscale scores: Pain, Disability, and Activity Limitation. | Pre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRIIRS | Faridabad | Haryana | 121004 | India |
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to institutional and ethical restrictions related to participant confidentiality and consent agreements. However, summarized data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: Study Protocol Summary | Apr 1, 2025 | Mar 18, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| Prot_ICF | Yes | No | Yes | Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form: Informed consent form | Apr 1, 2025 | Mar 18, 2026 | Prot_ICF_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form: Ethical form | Mar 11, 2025 | Mar 11, 2026 | ICF_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D036981 | Fasciitis, Plantar |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005208 | Fasciitis |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D005534 | Foot Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Foam Roller Therapy | Other | Self-myofascial release using a foam roller applied to the plantar fascia region to reduce pain and improve flexibility. |
|