Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R61MH133785 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study investigates whether a virtual reality-based mindfulness based intervention can reduce impulsive aggression in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The primary goal is to evaluate whether mindfulness delivered via VR (MBI-VR) improves emotion regulation and engages the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), a brain region involved in cognitive control and regulation of emotional responses. The study also examines whether these effects show a dose-related relationship.
Participants will be randomized to receive different doses of MBI-VR intervention or distraction tasks and will complete repeated mindfulness VR sessions. Brain activity will be measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during an emotion regulation task, along with clinical assessments of impulsive aggression related symptoms.
This is a randomized, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial designed to evaluate the effects of a mindfulness-based virtual reality intervention (MBI VR) on impulsive aggression and associated neural target engagement in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The study compares two different doses of MBI VR (16 sessions vs. 24 sessions) to a non-immersive Distraction Techniques control condition. Neural target engagement is assessed via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), with a focus on activation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) during an emotion regulation task.
Screening and Baseline Procedures
Potential participants are identified through a structured pre-screening process involving review of electronic and paper medical records to assess demographic eligibility, psychiatric diagnosis, aggression history, medication adherence, and medical suitability for MRI procedures. Individuals meeting preliminary eligibility criteria are approached for informed consent.
At the Screening Visit, participants undergo diagnostic confirmation using the SCID-5-RV, assessment of suicide risk using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS Baseline), review of medication adherence, and evaluation of impulsive aggression history using the Impulsive-Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS). Inclusion and exclusion criteria are confirmed through clinical interview, collateral information, and medical record review.
Eligible participants complete baseline clinical and behavioral assessments, including measures of aggression, impulsivity, psychopathology, mood, anxiety, quality of life, and mindfulness (as applicable). Baseline plasma antipsychotic levels are obtained to assess medication adherence and reduce pharmacologic confounding. Participants also complete a baseline fMRI scan at the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research.
Randomization and Study Arms
Following completion of baseline procedures, participants are randomized using a stratified randomization approach to ensure balance across treatment arms and study sites. Participants are assigned to one of the following groups:
Mindfulness-Based Intervention Virtual Reality (MBI VR) Distraction Techniques Control
All participants receive up to 24 sessions of their assigned intervention. Neuroimaging and clinical assessments are conducted at baseline, after completion of 16 sessions, and after completion of 24 sessions.
Mindfulness-Based Intervention Virtual Reality (MBI VR)
Participants randomized to the MBI VR group engage in guided mindfulness sessions delivered via the TRIPPâ„¢ virtual reality platform using a head-mounted display (Meta Quest 3). Each session lasts approximately 10 minutes and is conducted under supervision of trained research staff.
At the beginning of each session, participants rate their current mood and anxiety using the Oxford Daily Mood Scale (OMS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). These assessments are administered within the VR environment, with selections made using gaze-based interaction.
The TRIPP MBI VR experience places participants in immersive, computer-generated environments designed to promote relaxation, attentional focus, and emotional awareness. Environments consist of visually dynamic and abstract landscapes, light-based effects, and immersive spatial audio rather than realistic scenes. Guided mindfulness exercises are delivered by a virtual instructor and include breathing awareness, focused attention, body awareness, visualization meditation, and nonjudgmental observation of thoughts and emotions.
Participants are prompted to synchronize breathing with visual cues (e.g., expanding and contracting shapes), reinforcing interoceptive awareness and attentional regulation. Interactive elements are incorporated to enhance engagement while maintaining a non-competitive, exploratory experience. Ambient soundscapes and music are used to support relaxation and sustained attention.
At the conclusion of each session, participants again complete the OMS and STAI to assess immediate changes in mood and anxiety. Participants are encouraged to reflect briefly on their experience, similar to reflective components used in non-VR mindfulness interventions.
All VR sessions are managed via a mobile device management system that allows real-time monitoring and data collection. Research staff remain present to assist with equipment setup and to pause or discontinue sessions if participants experience discomfort or distress.
Distraction Techniques Control Condition
Participants randomized to the Distraction Techniques group engage in non-immersive distraction activities for approximately 10 minutes per session over the same 6-week period. Activities include listening to music, viewing images, or watching brief video clips selected to be engaging but not mindfulness-based.
Participants in this group receive treatment as usual (TAU) in the inpatient setting, including standard rehabilitative programming. The Distraction Techniques condition is designed to control for time, attention, and engagement while isolating the specific effects of immersive mindfulness training delivered via VR.
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
All participants undergo fMRI scanning at three time points: baseline, after 16 sessions, and after 24 sessions. Scans are conducted at the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research using a 3T Siemens Tim Trio scanner with a 32-channel head coil.
During each scan, participants complete a validated emotion regulation task adapted from Foti and Hajcak (2008). The task involves viewing neutral and unpleasant images from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), preceded by auditory descriptions that either encourage emotional reactivity or cognitive reappraisal. Participants practice the task outside the scanner prior to imaging to ensure comprehension.
The primary contrast of interest compares unpleasant images preceded by negative versus neutral descriptions, providing an index of emotion regulation. Activation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) during this contrast serves as the primary neural target engagement outcome.
Participants are not scanned within 24 hours of receiving PRN medications to minimize sedation effects. Transport to imaging sessions is conducted with hospital and research staff accompaniment to ensure safety.
Clinical and Behavioral Assessments
Clinical assessments are conducted at screening, baseline, weekly during the intervention period, and at post-intervention time points. Assessments include clinician-rated measures of aggression, psychopathology, and global clinical change, as well as self-report measures of impulsivity, mood, anxiety, quality of life, and mindfulness (MBI VR group only).
Aggression-related assessments include the IPAS, S-UPPS-P, OAS-M, PANSS (including PANSS Excitement Component), CGI-S and CGI-I Aggression, Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP), and real-world behavioral data (e.g., incidents, PRN use, restraints). Suicide risk is monitored throughout the study using the C-SSRS.
Raters conducting aggression and psychopathology assessments are blinded to treatment assignment. Wherever possible, the same rater evaluates a participant throughout the study to reduce inter-rater variability.
Safety Monitoring and Tolerability
Adverse events, including simulator sickness and distress related to VR exposure, are monitored throughout the study. The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) is administered following VR exposure. A score of ≥30 on the SSQ is considered indicative of intolerance and constitutes a criterion for withdrawal from VR participation.
Participants may discontinue participation at any time without impact on their standard psychiatric care. All participants continue to receive treatment as usual for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder throughout the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Virtual Reality (MBI-VR) | Other | The MBI VR is developed by TRIPP. Instead of naturalistic scenic images, the TRIPP MBI VR features intricate visually dynamic environments such as colorful surreal landscapes, light-based effects, floating shapes and immersive spatial soundscapes. These visuals encourage participants to focus on flowing designs, fostering a sense of engagement. The game-like quality of the virtual environment includes interactive elements where participants can manipulate shapes or respond to stimuli. This interactivity can enhance engagement, turning mindfulness meditation into a game-like playful and exploratory experience. The TRIPP MBI VR program offers guided sessions led by a virtual instructor, who provides verbal cues and instructions for the practice. This guidance includes breathing techniques, body awareness exercises, or instructions for focusing attention. |
|
| Distraction Tasks | Other | Tasks will include standard rehabilitative inpatient treatment as usual (TAU) which includes wellness and recovery sessions, coping skills, understanding medications, discharge preparation, and behavioral sessions and Distraction Techniques. Distraction Techniques that encompass activities designed to engage participants and divert their attention from discomfort or distressing thoughts. These techniques can include:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Virtual Reality Intervention | Other | MBI VR is managed through a mobile device management (MDM) solution that supports full access remotely, to ensure the real-time data collection. Research staff members will be available at each session to assist with operational aspects of the MBI VR program (e.g., setting up the VR system, pausing the system if the participant expresses discomfort or distress). MBI delivered via VR is generally considered to be well-tolerated (Dascal et a., 2017); therefore, we do not expect any significant adverse events to occur. However, any seasickness-type of sensation can last for a few hours and even up to a week depending on many factors. While some people rarely experience VR motion sickness, others may continuously suffer symptoms of motion sickness for weeks. The most important factor is the extent of time of uninterrupted exposure. In the present study the exposure is 10 minutes, which is not expected to cause significant VR motion sickness. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale | The Short UPPS-P is an instrument composed of 20 items rated on a four-point Likert scale: (1) disagree strongly, (2) disagree some, (3) agree some, and (4) agree strongly. Five scales were computed by adding the 4 items corresponding to each scale: (1) negative urgency (NU), the tendency to act impulsively when experiencing negative emotions (e.g., sadness, anger); (2) positive urgency (PU), the tendency to act rashly under extreme positive emotions or excitement; (3) sensation seeking (SS), the tendency to seek out novel and thrilling experiences, often involving risk; (4) lack of perseveration (PE), the inability to stay focused on a task, especially when it becomes difficult or boring; and (5) lack of premeditation (PR), difficulty thinking and reflecting on the consequences of an act before engaging in it. Each scale ranges from 4 to 16. | Will be conducted at Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after completion of 16 sessions of MBI-VR or Distraction Tasks), Week 6 (after completion of 24 sessions of MPV-VR or Distraction Tasks) |
| Impulsive-Premeditated Aggression Scale | The Impulsive-Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS; Mathias et al., 2007) will be administered at screening, baseline, after completion of 16 sessions and after completion of 24 sessions. The IPAS is a 30-item self-report questionnaire used to rate aggressive acts occurring over the past six months. Items are scored on a five-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Neutral; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly Agree). The scale differentiates three factors -premeditated aggression, here referred to as 'PM' and impulsive aggression, here referred to as 'IA'-that can be scored either dimensionally or categorically, and Familiarity Items (Stanford MS, Classification procedures, unpublished manual). Discrete categories (impulsive vs premeditated) are obtained by a categorical approach in which only the percentage of the positive items (5 = strongly agree or 4 = agree) for each aggression scale is calculated (Stanford MS, Classification procedures, unpublished manual). | Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale | The PANSS will be used to assess psychopathology. The PANSS is a 30-item, clinician-administered assessment that provides scores for positive, negative, and general psychopathology symptoms. The PANSS Excitement Component (PANSS EC; Lindenmayer et al., 2004a; Faay et al., 2018, Lindenmayer et al., 2004b, Montoya et al., 2011) will be examined to assess change in aggressive behaviors. Each PANSS item is scored from 1 to 7, with a minimum score of 30 and a maximum score of 210. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overt Aggression Scale - Modified | Our secondary outcome measure is time to aggressive acts as measured by the Overt Aggression Scale - Modified (OAS-M). The OAS-M is a four-part behavior rating scale used to evaluate and document the "frequency and severity" of aggressive episodes: verbal aggression, aggression against objects, aggression against self, and aggression against others. The OAS-M is a widely used measures for violence and aggression (Mattes, 2010). Each category is rated 0-4 based on severity, with the score multiplied by a weight (1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively) to produce a total weighted score. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oxford Daily Mood Scale (OMS) | The Oxford Daily Mood Scale is a self-assessment tool designed to help individuals quantify their emotional state throughout the day using a simple 10-point scale. This scale allows users to track fluctuations in their mood over time by assigning a score based on how they felt at different points during the day. Scale Description:
|
Inclusion Criteria:
TRIPP MBI VR and TAU Distraction Groups have the same inclusion criteria. Participants will:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will be excluded if they:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anzalee Khan, PhD | Contact | 646-766-5876 | anzalee.khan@nki.rfmh.org | |
| Benedicto Parker | Contact | 212-961-8992 | Benedicto.Parker@nki.rfmh.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anzalee Khan, PhD | Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research | Principal Investigator |
| Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer, MD | Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Psychiatric Center | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10035 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30081863 | Background | Klein Tuente S, Bogaerts S, van IJzendoorn S, Veling W. Effect of virtual reality aggression prevention training for forensic psychiatric patients (VRAPT): study protocol of a multi-center RCT. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1830-8. | |
| 25900066 | Background | Hoptman MJ. Impulsivity and aggression in schizophrenia: a neural circuitry perspective with implications for treatment. CNS Spectr. 2015 Jun;20(3):280-6. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000206. Epub 2015 Apr 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared to protect participant privacy and confidentiality, given the sensitive nature of the clinical, behavioral, and neuroimaging data collected in this study. The dataset includes detailed mental health assessments, aggression-related measures, and brain imaging data, which pose a risk of re-identification even after de-identification. In addition, participants did not provide consent for broad data sharing beyond the scope of the study. Therefore, to comply with ethical standards, informed consent agreements, and applicable privacy regulations, IPD will not be made publicly available.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| D000374 | Aggression |
| D000080103 | Emotional Regulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D000096762 | Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a randomized, parallel-group, multicenter interventional clinical trial designed to evaluate the effects of a mindfulness-based virtual reality intervention (MBI VR) on impulsive aggression and neural target engagement in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The study compares two different doses of MBI VR with a non-immersive Distraction Techniques control condition.
Following completion of screening and baseline assessments, eligible participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two study arms: (1) MBI VR - 24 sessions/MBI VR - 16 sessions, or (2) Distraction Techniques control. Randomization is stratified by study site to ensure balance across treatment groups.
Participants assigned to the MBI VR arms receive guided mindfulness training delivered via an immersive virtual reality platform. Sessions are conducted under supervision and last approximately 10 minutes each. The intervention is designed to promote attention regulation,
Not provided
Not provided
The clinical team assessments will be done by the clinical team, independent from the research assessments. Raters who are completing assessments examining aggression and impulsive aggression including the PANSS, S-UPPS-P, OAS-M, CGI-S Aggression, CGI-I Aggression, IPAS, and PSAP will be blinded to the treatment assignment. To ensure blinding of these raters, the following will be done:
Raters administering and scoring assessments will be independent from the team delivering the treatment or intervention (e.g., VR mindfulness or distraction condition). They will have no access to information about treatment assignments or session content.
Communications with participants will avoid mentioning any content or terms that might reveal group assignment.
Treatment assignment will be coded and stored separate from assessment data in a secure system accessible only to unblinded study personnel. Raters will only receive Participant ID numbers and will not have access to group assign
|
| Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Clinical Global Impression Aggression Scales | The CGI rating scales are tools used to evaluate both the severity of illness and change from baseline (Guy 1976). The CGI-S Aggression reflects the severity of illness on a 7-point scale ranging from no symptoms (1) to very severe (7). The CGI-I Aggression is used to assess the clinical change as compared to symptoms at baseline using a 7-point scale, ranging from very much improved (1) to very much worse (7). | Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm | The PSAP is a commonly used behavioral aggression paradigm wherein participants earn points (i.e., money) and can steal points from (i.e., aggressive behavior) or have points stolen by an opponent (i.e., provocation), reflecting a more social/non-violent form of reactive aggression. Aggression is scored by counting the number of button presses (e.g., 40, 50, or 100) on a "provocation" button that removes points from the opponent, or by total point subtractions per trial. | Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form | The QLES-Q-SF will be administered at each study visit to measure patient-assessed health and well-being. This brief, self-report measure is made up of 16 items and is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, and the higher the total score, the more satisfied the patient is with life. The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) is a 16-item self-report tool where the first 14 items are summed to measure life satisfaction (scores 14-70), with higher scores indicating greater enjoyment. Items use a 5-point Likert scale (1=Very Poor, 5=Very Good). It is converted to a 0-100% scale for interpretation. | Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Five-facet Mindfulness Questionnaire | The Five-facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006) is a 15 question self-report scale that measures mindfulness with regards to thoughts, experiences, and actions in daily life. The FFMQ-15 measures 5 subscales of mindfulness: Observing, Describing, Acting with Awareness, Non-judgement, and Non-reactivity. The FFMQ will only be completed by participants who are assigned to the MBI VR Group. The self-report scale scored on a 1-5 Likert scale (1=Never true, 5=Very often true). It measures five facets of mindfulness by summing item scores, with some items reverse-scored to indicate higher mindfulness with higher total scores. | Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 (after 16 sessions), Week 6 (after 24 sessions) |
| Number of PRN Medications Issued for Aggressive Behavior | The metric measures the total count of "pro re nata" (PRN) or "as needed" medications administered to a patient in response to acts of physical violence, verbal aggression, or extreme agitation. It is used to monitor behavioral stability, evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions, and ensure safety against over-sedation or misuse. | The number of PRN medications will be collected from 3 months prior to Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6. |
| Number and Type of Aggressive Incidents | Aggressive incidents will be collected from hospital medical records. Types of Aggressive Incidents
| Number and Type of Assaultive Incidents will be collected 3 months prior to Baseline (Day 1), Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6. |
| The Oxford Mood Scale is done prior to the start of each MBI VR or Distraction Techniques sessions at Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 6. |
| Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Baseline | The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a clinical tool designed to assess suicide risk, facilitating comprehensive evaluations in both clinical and research settings. Below is an extended description of the scale, its application, and its significance in assessing suicide risk. The C-SSRS aims to: Identify Individuals at Risk: It helps health professionals determine the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior in individuals, enabling timely intervention. Facilitate Management Plans: By quantifying suicide risk, this scale informs treatment planning and follow-up strategies. Standardize Assessments: It provides a structured format for evaluating suicidality, enhancing reliability across different raters and settings. | The C-SSRS Baseline version will be completed at Baseline (Day 1) for all study participants. |
| Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Since Last Visit | The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a clinical tool designed to assess suicide risk, facilitating comprehensive evaluations in both clinical and research settings. Below is an extended description of the scale, its application, and its significance in assessing suicide risk. The C-SSRS aims to: Identify Individuals at Risk: It helps health professionals determine the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior in individuals, enabling timely intervention. Facilitate Management Plans: By quantifying suicide risk, this scale informs treatment planning and follow-up strategies. Standardize Assessments: It provides a structured format for evaluating suicidality, enhancing reliability across different raters and settings. | The C-SSRS Since Last Visit version is completed once a week at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 6. |
| Simulator Sickness Questionnaire | The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) is a 16-item self-report tool developed by Kennedy et al. (1993) to quantify side effects from virtual environments or flight simulators. It rates symptoms - nausea, oculomotor, and disorientation, on a 0-3 scale, widely used to assess cybersickness in VR. Scores determine overall severity, aiding in identifying problematic simulators. The SSQ measures 16 symptoms (e.g., headache, eyestrain, dizziness, vertigo, nausea) rated by the participant as "None" (0), "Slight" (1), "Moderate" (2), or "Severe" (3). Subscales: Symptoms are grouped into three factors: 1. Nausea (N): General discomfort, increased salivation, sweating, nausea, difficulty concentrating, stomach awareness, burping. 2. Oculomotor (O): General discomfort, fatigue, headache, eyestrain, difficulty focusing, difficulty concentrating, blurred vision. 3. Disorientation (D): Difficulty focusing, nausea, fullness of head, blurred vision, dizziness, vertigo. | The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire is administered after the participant has completed each MBI VR session at each visit (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 6). |
| Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) - Research Version | The SCID-5-RV (Research Version) is a specialized adaptation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) designed specifically for use in clinical trials. This version has been reformatted, streamlined, and optimized to meet the requirements of clinical research protocols. The SCID-5 is primarily designed to ensure that major psychiatric diagnoses, as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM- 5), are systematically evaluated. | The SCID-5-RV will be completed at Screening to confirm diagnosis. |
| Mobile App Rating Scale | The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) is a reliable, multidimensional tool designed to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps across 23 items covering engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and subjective impact. It uses a 5-point scale (1-inadequate to 5-excellent) to evaluate apps, making it a standard instrument for researchers and developers to ensure high-quality, evidence-based app development. The MARS includes the following dimensions: 1. Assesses apps based on Engagement (fun, interest), 2. Functionality (performance, navigation), 3. Aesthetics (layout, graphics), and 4. Information Quality (accuracy, evidence base). | The MARS is completed at Week 24 or Early Termination Visits. |
| Antipsychotic Plasma Levels | In order to ascertain medication adherence and to minimize confounding effects of antipsychotic medication treatment, we will measure antipsychotic plasma level at baseline, and after 16 and 24 sessions. | Measurements of antipsychotic plasma level will be taken at Baseline (Day 1), Week 4 and Week 6. |
| Number of seclusion or restraints related to aggressive behaviors | Seclusion and restraint are last-resort safety measures for imminent, severe aggression or self-injury, not for punishment or convenience. They involve involuntary confinement or physical/mechanical restriction of movement. These practices carry risks of serious injury, trauma, and, in rare cases, fatality, requiring strict, immediate oversight. The number of times a participant was restrained or secluded will be collected. | The number of seclusions and restraints will be collected from 3 months prior to Baseline (Day 1) and at Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 6. |
| Number and Type of Arrests | "Number and Type of Arrests" measures the volume and nature of law enforcement apprehensions. It will be used to track the total count of crimes committed, as one incident may result in multiple arrests or vice versa. The following will be collected: 1. Total Volume: The aggregate count of all arrests made, 2. Type of Offense (i.e., Group A Offenses: includes violent crimes (homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault), property crimes (burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, arson), and drug offenses; Group B Offenses: Crimes for which only arrest data are reported, such as disorderly conduct, DUI, drunkenness, and vagrancy). | The number and type of arrests will be collected from 3 months prior to Baseline (Day 1) and at Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 6. |
| NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center Westchester Division | Recruiting | White Plains | New York | 10605 | United States |
|
| 25073506 | Background | Hoptman MJ, Antonius D, Mauro CJ, Parker EM, Javitt DC. Cortical thinning, functional connectivity, and mood-related impulsivity in schizophrenia: relationship to aggressive attitudes and behavior. Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;171(9):939-48. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111553. |
| 33343427 | Background | Fritz M, Shenar R, Cardenas-Morales L, Jager M, Streb J, Dudeck M, Franke I. Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior Among Psychiatric Patients With Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, or Alcohol Dependency and the Effect of Depression and Self-Esteem on Aggression. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 3;11:599828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599828. eCollection 2020. |
| 29740365 | Background | Flores A, Linehan MM, Todd SR, Hoffman HG. The Use of Virtual Reality to Facilitate Mindfulness Skills Training in Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Study. Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 23;9:531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00531. eCollection 2018. |
| 20141299 | Background | Farb NA, Anderson AK, Mayberg H, Bean J, McKeon D, Segal ZV. Minding one's emotions: mindfulness training alters the neural expression of sadness. Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):25-33. doi: 10.1037/a0017151. |
| Background | Davis L, Kurzban S. Mindfulness-based treatment for people with severe mental illness: a literature review. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. 2012;15(2):202-232.doi:10.1080/15487768.2012.679578 |
| 10524601 | Background | Dale AM. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(2-3):109-14. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-W. |
| 23750881 | Background | Cutcliffe JR, Riahi S. Systemic perspective of violence and aggression in mental health care: towards a more comprehensive understanding and conceptualization: part 1. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Dec;22(6):558-67. doi: 10.1111/inm.12029. Epub 2013 Jun 11. |
| Background | Cohn AM, Jakupcak M, Seibert LA, Hildebrandt TB, Zeichner A. The role of emotion dysregulation in the association between men's restrictive emotionality and use of physical aggression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2010;11(1):53. |
| 19545481 | Background | Chadwick P, Hughes S, Russell D, Russell I, Dagnan D. Mindfulness groups for distressing voices and paranoia: a replication and randomized feasibility trial. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Jul;37(4):403-12. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990166. Epub 2009 Jun 23. |
| 12703651 | Background | Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822. |
| 20015584 | Background | Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):217-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 20. |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D012919 | Social Behavior |
| D000068356 | Self-Control |