Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Placed by Undergraduate Students and Postgraduate Trainees: A Retrospective Study Using USPHS and FDI Criteria
Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Placed by Undergraduate Students and Postgraduate Trainees: A Retrospective Study Using USPHS and FDI Criteria
This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students and postgraduate specialty trainees in pediatric patients. Dental records of children aged 6 to 13 years who received posterior composite restorations at a university-based pediatric dentistry clinic were reviewed.
A total of 200 restorations placed on primary and permanent molars were clinically evaluated during routine follow-up visits using standardized assessment systems. The modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria and the FDI World Dental Federation criteria were used to assess esthetic, functional, and biological outcomes. Evaluations were performed by a blinded examiner, and radiographic assessments were conducted when clinically indicated.
Clinical outcomes were compared between operator groups according to training level, follow-up duration, restoration type, tooth type, and endodontic treatment history. The findings of this study aim to provide insight into the impact of operator experience on the clinical success and longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in pediatric dentistry and to support evidence-based improvements in undergraduate and postgraduate dental education.
This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of a university-based dental faculty to compare the clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students and postgraduate specialty trainees.
Dental records of pediatric patients aged 6 to 13 years who received posterior resin composite restorations on primary or permanent first and second molars were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 200 restorations were included in the study, of which 100 were placed by undergraduate students and 100 by postgraduate trainees. All restorations were placed using the same microhybrid resin composite material as part of routine clinical care.
Restorations were excluded if they were placed by operators outside the defined study groups, if materials other than resin composite were used, if follow-up duration was less than three months, or if the restorations were placed on teeth other than posterior molars. Clinical evaluations were performed during routine follow-up or concurrent dental treatment visits.
All restorations were assessed by a blinded examiner using two standardized evaluation systems: the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS-Ryge) criteria and the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-Hickel) criteria. Esthetic, functional, and biological parameters were evaluated clinically, and radiographic assessments were performed when clinically indicated. Under the USPHS criteria, restorations were categorized as acceptable or unacceptable. According to the FDI criteria, scores of 1-2 were considered successful, score 3 clinically acceptable, and scores of 4-5 unsuccessful.
Recorded variables included operator group, restoration type (one-, two-, or three-surface), follow-up duration, tooth type (primary or permanent), patient age, and endodontic treatment history. Clinical outcomes were compared between operator groups and across follow-up intervals to evaluate the influence of operator experience and time on restoration performance.
Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate non-parametric tests due to non-normal data distribution. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and group comparisons were conducted with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
The results of this study aim to clarify the role of operator experience in the long-term success of posterior resin composite restorations in pediatric patients and to contribute to evidence-based improvements in undergraduate and postgraduate dental training programs.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: