Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to perform a comparison between the clinical performance of short fiber-reinforced composite and indirect lab composite restorations in posterior dentition.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber-reinforced composite | Active Comparator |
| |
| Indirect lab composite | Active Comparator |
| |
| Conventional microhybrid resin composite | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber-reinforced composite | Other | short fiber-reinforced composite used as base covered by conventional composite |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| FDI criteria for evaluation | Three years follow-up |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansoura university | Al Mansurah | Dakahlia Governorate | 35516 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| indirect lab composite | Other | indirect lab processed resin composite inlay restorations |
|
| Conventional resin composite | Other | conventional microhybrid resin composite posterior restorations |
|