Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled study is aimed to evaluate the esthetic, clinical, and radiographic outcomes following the placement of immediate single-tooth implant with hard and soft tissue augmentation.
Subjects will randomly assigned to one of two groups:
The main questions it aims to answer is:
Is there is a significant difference in the esthetic outcome between bone augmentation alone and bone augmentation combined with connective tissue graft after immediate dental implant in the esthetic zone?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hard tissue augmentation with connective tissue graft | Experimental | Hard tissue augmentation (bone grafting) with additional connective tissue graft (CTG) performed at the same time following immediate dental implant in the esthetic zone |
|
| Hard tissue augmentation | Active Comparator | Hard tissue augmentation (bone grafting) following immediate dental implant in the esthetic zone. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate dental implant in the esthetic zone | Procedure | Placement of immediate dental implant after tooth extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pink Esthetic Score (PES) | Seven variables to be scored: mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature of the facial mucosa, level of the facial mucosa, alveolar process, soft tissue color, and texture of facial gingiva at the implant site. A score of 0, 1, or 2 will be given to each parameter to obtain a final score of 14. | Pink esthetic score (PES) will be assessed at 6 months postoperatively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hard tissue assessment (facial bone thickness) | Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to assess the thickness of the facial (labial/buccal) plate of bone at two points: the implant platform and a point 5mm apical to the implant platform. | 6 months postoperatively |
| Patient satisfaction questionnaire |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khalid Khalid, Bachelor of Dental Surgery | Contact | +9647716641706 | khaled.waleed2408m@codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Baghdad/ College of Dentistry/ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery/ Implant Unit | Recruiting | Baghdad | Rusafa | 10047 | Iraq |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessment of patient satisfaction will be performed at 6 months postoperatively with a self-administered patient questionnaire regarding overall satisfaction and satisfaction of color and shape of the mucosa using a visual analogue scale (VAS, left = very dissatisfied [0], right = very satisfied [10]. |
| 6 months postoperatively |
| Implant survival rate | Implant survival rate at 6 months (defined by absence of mobility, infection, pain, and peri-implant bone loss). | 6 months postoperatively |
| Rate of complications | complications such as infection, graft rejection and peri-implantitis will be assessed from the intervention up to 6 months postoperatively. | From the intervention to 6 month postoperatively |