Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale: The 2019 Belgian Health Survey shows that the combined oral contraceptive pill is the most commonly used form of contraception. However, the Pearl index of Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods is significantly better (perfect and typical use <0.5) compared to the combined oral contraceptive pill (perfect use <1.0, typical use 2-9). An IUS is an example of a LARC method. IUS insertion might be painful. Because of this, women may be reluctant to opt for an IUS. The traditional technique for an IUS insertion uses a speculum after which a Pozzi tenaculum is placed on the cervix so that the uterus is brought into the stretching position by means of traction. The cavum is then measured by a uterine sound. These actions and the use of these instruments can contribute to the pain experience during insertion. The new technique, transabdominal sonographic (TAS) insertion, could reduce the pain experience during insertion. This new technique uses transabdominal sonography during IUS placement. The placement under constant visualization eliminates the need for Pozzi tenaculum and uterine soundings. Little high quality studies have been conducted on the advantages and disadvantages of the TAS technique as demonstrated by a non-published systematic review of the literature.
Research question/goal: Is the insertion of an IUS (Kyleena/Mirena) using the TAS technique less painful than the traditional technique?
Study design: A randomized trial (RCT) in which the subject is blinded to the insertion technique.
Study population: Women wishing an IUS (Kyleena & Mirena)
Primary and secondary outcomes:
The primary outcomes are the pain during insertion (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score 0-10) and dislocation: non-fundal position (> 3mm fundal distance postinsertion) in the uterine cavity (Y/N).
Secondary outcomes include the average and worst pain in the first week after insertion (NRS 0-10), expulsion of the IUS, perforation of the uterine wall, failure of insertion, the occurrence of vagal symptoms, use of pain relief the first 7 days after placement, subject satisfaction about the procedure, successful IUS placement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| The TAS (transabominal ultrasound) insertion technique | Experimental | This new technique uses transabdominal sonography during IUS placement. The placement under constant visualization eliminates the need for Pozzi tenaculum and uterine soundings. |
|
| The Traditional Technique | Active Comparator | The traditional technique for an IUS insertion uses a speculum after which a Pozzi tenaculum is placed on the cervix so that the uterus is brought into the stretching position by means of traction. The cavum is then measured by a uterine sound. These actions and the use of these instruments can contribute to the pain experience during insertion. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUS (intrauterine system) insertion | Procedure | Intra-uterine device insertion (technique based on randomization arm) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain during insertion of the IUS | Pain during insertion, reported by the subject on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS scale) 0-10 | From enrollment to the intervention date (IUS placement) |
| Dislocation | Dislocation: non-fundal position (> 3mm fundal distance postinsertion) in the uterine cavity (Y/N) | From enrollment to intervention date (IUS placement) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expulsion | Expulsion of the IUS during the procedure (Y/N) | During of directly after the intervention (IUS placement) |
| Failure of insertion | Failure of insertion (yes/no) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margot Van Geyte, MD | Contact | +329323044 | margot.vangeyte@uzgent.be | |
| Study team Gynaecology & Obstetrics UZ Gent | Contact | +32 9 332 48 72 | studieco.vrouwenkliniek@uzgent.be |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Steven Weyers, MD, PhD | University Hospital, Ghent | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| R. Charafeddine, E. Braekman, L. Gisle, S. Drieskens. Gezondheidsenquête 2018: Seksuele gezondheid. Brussel, België: Sciensano Rapportnummer: D/2019/14.440/60. Beschikbaar op: www.gezondheidsenquête.be | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004343 | Drug Implants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003692 | Delayed-Action Preparations |
| D004304 | Dosage Forms |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| During the procedure of IUS placement |
| vagal symptoms | Vagal symptoms: paillor, sweating, syncope (yes/no) | During IUD insertion |
| Pain experience during 7 days after placement | Pain experience (average and worst pain) during 7 days after placement (NRS 0-10) | During the 7 days after IUS insertion |
| Pain relief taken during the 7 days after IUS placement | Pain relief taken during the 7 days after placement (Y/N, if yes specify in text field (what, dose, timing)) | During the 7 days after IUS placement |
| Satisfaction with the procedure | Subject satisfaction with the technique (5 point Likert scale) | Seven days after IUS placement |
| Successful IUS placement | Successful IUS placement (Y/N) | Directly after IUS insertion procedure |
| Perforation | Perforation: IUS perforates the uterine wall (Y/N). Characterized by sharp pain and blood loss during insertion, ultrasound extrauterine position in total perforation or positioned in the myometrium in partial perforation. | During IUS placement |