Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will be screened over the phone or in Tufts GYN clinic for participation in the study. If eligible and interested in participating, written informed consent (and assent if applicable) will be obtained. After informed consent/assent, the patient will be enrolled in the study. The patient will decide if they desire to use TENS unit during IUD insertion appointment and inform the study team. The clinic visit will proceed as normal, with additional study proceedings as follows. The study personnel will complete the 'Background Questionnaire' with the patient prior to IUD insertion. During the IUD insertion appointment, study personnel will assist in collection of the 'Study visit' data collection form. This includes recording the patient's pain score at various time points throughout the insertion procedure:
Study personnel will also time the insertion procedure and collect additional data as outlined in the 'Study visit data collection form.' After IUD insertion, the participant will be asked to complete the 'Post-IUD Insertion Survey.' Once this survey is complete, this will conclude the study participation. Participation will last through the study visit only.
As part of the standard of care, a urine pregnancy test will be obtained and confirmed negative prior to IUD insertion. Patients will receive routine pain management modalities per shared decision-making with their clinical provider which may include NSAID administration, paracervical block, and heating pad.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENS unit | Experimental | Patients who choose to use a TENS unit for their IUD insertion procedure |
|
| Standard care | Active Comparator | Patients who decline to use a TENS unit for their IUD insertion procedure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) unit | Device | Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a method of pain relief involving the use of a mild electrical current. A TENS machine is a small, battery-operated device that has leads connected to sticky pads called electrodes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self reported pain intensity from participants during IUD insertion | Survey responses | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain at other time points during IUD insertion procedure | Survey responses | Day 1 |
| Rate of vasovagal responses | Participant observation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Unable to provide informed consent/assent
Prior cervical procedure (ie loop electrosurgical excision procedure, LEEP)
Concurrent cervical or intrauterine procedure (ie colposcopy or dilation and curettage)
Cutaneous damage at the TENS electrode sites
Chronic or pre-procedure use of opioids
Chronic pain diagnosis
Prior IUD insertion
Any contraindication to intrauterine device (IUD):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitie McCarthy, MD | Contact | 617-636-9897 | caitlin.mccarthy@tuftsmedicine.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Zuckerman, MD | Tufts Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tufts Medical Center | Recruiting | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24560479 | Background | Potter J, Rubin SE, Sherman P. Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City. Contraception. 2014 May;89(5):446-50. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 21. | |
| 16824298 | Background | Asker C, Stokes-Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006 Apr;32(2):89-94. doi: 10.1783/147118906776276170. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| D057240 | Patient Preference |
| D059787 | Acute Pain |
| D050497 | Stillbirth |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004561 | Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation |
| D059039 | Standard of Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Standard care | Other | Paracervical block only or participant declines analgesia for IUD insertion |
|
| Day 1 |
| Likelihood to recommend pain management regiment to a friend for same procedure | Survey responses | Day 1 |
| 20654760 | Background | Fleming KL, Sokoloff A, Raine TR. Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception. 2010 Aug;82(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.020. Epub 2010 Apr 13. |
| 23287602 | Background | Kavanaugh ML, Frohwirth L, Jerman J, Popkin R, Ethier K. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013 Apr;26(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Dec 31. |
| 31401254 | Background | Callahan DG, Garabedian LF, Harney KF, DiVasta AD. Will it Hurt? The Intrauterine Device Insertion Experience and Long-Term Acceptability Among Adolescents and Young Women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Dec;32(6):615-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8. |
| 29683910 | Background | ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735: Adolescents and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e130-e139. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632. |
| 27548557 | Background | American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Expert Work Group. Committee Opinion No 672: Clinical Challenges of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):e69-77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001644. |
| 28826645 | Background | Crawford M, Davy S, Book N, Elliott JO, Arora A. Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Aug 18. |
| 2888542 | Background | Nagatomo T, Tajiri A, Nakamura T, Hokibara R, Tanaka Y, Aono J, Tsuchihashi H. Adrenergic and serotonergic receptor-blocking potencies of terazosin, a new antihypertensive agent, as assessed by radioligand binding assay. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1987 Apr;35(4):1629-32. doi: 10.1248/cpb.35.1629. No abstract available. |
| 22770792 | Background | Mody SK, Kiley J, Rademaker A, Gawron L, Stika C, Hammond C. Pain control for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block. Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):704-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 6. |
| 14622708 | Background | Sluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain. 2003 Apr;4(3):109-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434. |
| 3327829 | Background | Rignon-Bret JM, Pompignoli M. [Esthetic presentation]. Inf Dent. 1987 Sep 24;69(32):2757-72. No abstract available. French. |
| 28079781 | Background | Lison JF, Amer-Cuenca JJ, Piquer-Marti S, Benavent-Caballer V, Bivia-Roig G, Marin-Buck A. Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):363-370. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001842. |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D005313 | Fetal Death |
| D011248 | Pregnancy Complications |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D003643 | Death |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D000698 |
| Analgesia |
| D000760 | Anesthesia and Analgesia |
| D019984 | Quality Indicators, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |