Personalised EIT-guided Ventilation Strategy Versus Conventional Protective Ventilation Strategy in ARDS Patients: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled triaL
Personalised EIT-guided Ventilation Strategy Versus Conventional Protective Ventilation Strategy in ARDS Patients: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled triaL
The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn if an individualized, bedside electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided ventilation strategy (including EIT-guided prone positioning and PEEP titration) can improve outcomes compared with a conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the individualized EIT-guided ventilation strategy reduce 28-day mortality in ARDS patients? Researchers will compare the EIT-guided intervention arm to a control arm receiving routine lung-protective ventilation (without bedside EIT guidance) to see if the EIT-guided approach lowers 28-day mortality and improves other clinical outcomes.
Adult ARDS patients who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to EIT-guided group and control group through stratified randomization:
EIT-guided group: Undergo bedside EIT assessments using a China-manufactured EIT device to guide decisions about prone positioning and individualized PEEP titration (including a recruitment maneuver).
Control group: Receive PEEP setting per conventional PEEP-FiO₂ tables and prone positioning per standard clinical indications without EIT guidance.
Both groups: Receive standard supportive ICU care and routine outcome assessments at multiple time points.
Primary outcome: 28-day mortality. Other outcomes include ventilator-free days to day 28 and so on.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation who meet the following diagnostic criteria:
ARDS onset within 1 week.
Mechanical ventilation ≤ 72 hours.
Exclusion Criteria:
tjmuhhw@163.com86-010-69152300
yuansiyi@pumch.cn86-010-69152300