Quick Relief or Real Response? Acute Effects of Percussion Massage Versus Sham Treatment in Individuals With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Quick Relief or Real Response? Acute Effects of Percussion Massage Versus Sham Treatment in Individuals With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the acute effects of percussion massage therapy compared with a sham intervention on cervical range of motion and pressure pain threshold in individuals with nonspecific neck pain.
Nonspecific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with reduced cervical mobility and increased pain sensitivity. Percussion massage therapy has gained popularity as a therapeutic modality; however, evidence regarding its true physiological effects remains limited.
This single-blind randomized controlled trial investigated the immediate effects of percussion massage therapy compared with a sham intervention in individuals with nonspecific neck pain. Participants were randomly allocated to either a percussion massage therapy group or a sham percussion therapy group. Cervical range of motion and pressure pain threshold were assessed before and immediately after the intervention.
Inclusion Criteria
Adults aged 18 to 60 years
Diagnosis of nonspecific neck pain
Resting neck pain intensity of ≥3 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
History of cervical spine fracture, tumor, or inflammatory disease
Previous surgery involving the neck or shoulder region
Neurological deficits related to the cervical spine
Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
Cognitive impairment or inability to understand study procedures