Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this observational study is to compare the treatment durations of different stages of routine root canal therapy performed on maxillary molar teeth using direct vision, magnification loupes, and a dental operating microscope.
The primary question the study seeks to answer is whether there is a significant difference in the duration of endodontic procedures performed under different magnification techniques.
Patients indicated for root canal treatment in their maxillary first molar teeth will receive standard root canal therapy in accordance with routine clinical protocols. The duration of each procedural step will be recorded and subsequently compared among the three magnification methods.
In this observational study, routine root canal treatment procedures will be performed in accordance with standard endodontic protocols on patients who applied to the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Uşak University, and were indicated for root canal treatment on their maxillary first molar teeth.
Application of the coronal restoration
All steps will be carried out according to standard clinical endodontic protocols under rubber dam isolation. The duration of each stage will be recorded individually.
Participants will be divided into three groups based on the magnification technique used during treatment:
Group 1: Treatments performed under direct vision
Group 2: Treatments performed using dental loupes
Group 3: Treatments performed using a dental operating microscope
All procedures in each group will follow the same standardized root canal treatment protocol, differing only in the magnification technique employed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients treated under direct vision | Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed without magnification, using direct visual inspection only. | ||
| Patients treated using dental loupes | Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed using 5× magnification dental loupes. | ||
| Patients treated using a dental operating microscope | Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed using a dental operating microscope at 8×-16× magnification. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of each procedural step in endodontic treatment | The duration (in seconds) of each of seven key procedural stages performed during routine root canal treatment on maxillary first molar teeth:
Each stage was timed separately for three groups (direct vision, dental loupes, and dental operating microscope) to compare the effect of different magnification techniques on working efficiency. | From the start of access cavity preparation to the completion of coronal restoration during a single treatment visit (approximately 35-120 minutes). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of MB2 canal according to magnification technique | The presence or absence of a second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in maxillary first molar teeth will be recorded for each magnification group (direct vision, dental loupes, and dental operating microscope). The association between the magnification method and MB2 canal detection will be evaluated using the Chi-square test (Monte Carlo simulation). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients admitted to the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Uşak University, who required root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Oğuz Tavşan, Assistant Professor | Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics | Principal Investigator |
| Tuğçe N Çağlar, Research Assistant | Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics | Uşak | 64000 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12043874 | Background | Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002 Apr;28(4):324-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200204000-00016. | |
| 25887978 | Background | Wong AW, Zhu X, Zhang S, Li SK, Zhang C, Chu CH. Treatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe. BMC Oral Health. 2015 Mar 20;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0025-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
The individual participant data collected in this study will not be shared with other researchers. Data will be used only for academic purposes within the scope of the thesis and institutional ethics approval.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Apr 22, 2026 | |
| Reset | May 13, 2026 | |
| Release | Jun 4, 2026 | |
| Reset | Jun 30, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | May 13, 2026 | |||
| Jun 4, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline (at the time of canal orifice identification) |
| Jun 30, 2026 |
| Jul 1, 2026 |