Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of PEEK versus Titanium Bar Attachments with Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology measuring retention of the overdenture and implant evaluation for 6 months and one year
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of PEEK material | Experimental | digital fabrications techniques |
|
| Group Ӏ (control group): Six patients will receive digital mandibular implant overdenture assisted b | Active Comparator | • Clinical evaluation |
|
| PEEK group new material | Experimental |
| |
| PEEK material study group | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| implant overdenture | Device | using of CAD/CAM with new material and digital fabrication techniques |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| retention of mandibular overdenture | Retention of the mandibular implant-assisted complete overdenture will be measured using a digital force meter. Measurements will be taken at 6 months and 12 months after denture insertion. | 6 months and 12 months post-insertion |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Completely edentulous patients free from systemic diseases that may affect soft or hard tissue healing.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry | Tanta | Elgharbiy | Egypt |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol: Evaluation of digitalPEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments | Feb 20, 2024 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_000.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol: . Evaluation of digitalPEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments | Feb 20, 2024 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_001.pdf |
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attach | Feb 20, 2024 | Sep 7, 2025 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol: Evaluation of digital PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments | Feb 20, 2024 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_003.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol: Evaluation of digital PEE Versus Titanium Bar Attachments | Feb 20, 2024 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_004.pdf |
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: . Evaluation of Digit PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments | Feb 20, 2024 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_SAP_005.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol: . Evaluation of digital PEE Versus Titanium Bar Attachments | Feb 20, 2024 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_006.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided