Reliability and Validity of Tele-Assessment for Functional Performance in Older vs. Younger Adults

Establishing the Reliability and Validity of Tele-Assessment for Functional Performance in Older Adults: A Comparative Study With Younger Individuals

This cross-sectional, comparative study aims to examine the intra-rater reliability, validity, and feasibility of tele-assessment versions of three functional mobility tests-the Timed Up and Go (TUG), 30-second Sit-to-Stand (30sSTS), and Gait Speed Test (GST)-in community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). To provide a comparative perspective, the same assessments will also be administered to a younger, healthy control group (18-44 years). The study seeks to determine whether tele-assessment can serve as a robust and practical alternative to in-person testing, thereby enhancing accessibility and ensuring high-quality functional evaluation in geriatric populations.

• Inclusion Criteria (Older Adults, ≥65 years) Community-dwelling Independent in activities of daily living Able to provide informed consent Capable of performing TUG, 30sSTS, and GST without assistance
• Inclusion Criteria (Younger Adults, 18-44 years) Healthy individuals without acute or chronic conditions affecting mobility Able to provide informed consent Capable of performing TUG, 30sSTS, and GST independently
• Exclusion Criteria (both groups) Diagnosed neurological disorders (other than age-related decline) Uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic disease Recent surgery or fractures Severe cognitive impairment Contraindications to physical activity Lack of access to required telecommunication technology