Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical investigation is to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the M1133AX5, M1133AX6, and AlarX4 (nasal ala application) SpO2 sensors under test with the Philips FAST Pulse Oximetry technology.
The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the M1133AX5, M1133AX6, and AlarX4 (nasal ala application) SpO2 sensors under test with the Philips FAST Pulse Oximetry technology during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2, when compared with the reference SaO2 obtained from CO-Oximetry analysis of arterial blood samples.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEST GROUP 1 | Sensor Test Group 1
|
| |
| TEST GROUP 2 | Sensor Test Group 2
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO INTERVENTION | Device | NO INTERVENTION |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SPO2 ACCURACY | Accuracy expressed in Arms of SpO2 measurements obtained from the M1133AX5, M1133AX6, and AlarX4 (nasal ala placement) SpO2 sensors under test with the Philips Pulse Oximetry technology over the range of 70-100% SaO2 in comparison to SaO2 as ground truth. | OCTOBER 2025-JANUARY 2026 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SPO2 ACCURACY | Accuracy expressed in Arms of SpO2 measurements obtained from the AlaxX4 SpO2 sensor (earlobe placement) with the Philips Pulse Oximetry technology over the range of 70-100% SaO2 in comparison to SaO2 as ground truth. | OCTOBER 2025-JANUARY 2026 |
| DIFFERENTIAL MEAN |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participant is considered as being morbidly obese (defined as BMI >39.5)
Compromised circulation (i.e., Raynaud's Syndrome), injury, or physical malformation of fingers, toes, hands, ears or forehead/skull or other sensor sites which would limit the ability to test sites needed for the study. Tattoos (e.g. permanent, Henna) or artificial dyes (e.g. spray tan, artificial tanning lotion) in the optical path which would limit the ability to test sites needed for the study. (Note: Certain malformations may still allow participants to participate if the condition is noted and would not affect the sites utilized.)
Females who are pregnant
Females who are trying to get pregnant with confirmation of positive urine pregnancy test
Participants who have smoked in the last 2 days or participants who have refrained, for at least 48 hours, with COHb levels >3% as assessed with a Masimo Radical 7 (Rainbow)
Participants with known respiratory conditions such as: (self-reported)
Participants with self-reported heart or cardiovascular conditions such as: (self-reported, except for blood pressure and ECG review)
Participants with self-reported health conditions as identified in the Health Assessment Form
Participants with known clotting disorders (selfreported)
Participants with self-reported dermatological conditions at sensor application sites
Participants with severe allergies to iodine (only applicable if iodine is used)
Participants with severe allergies to lidocaine (or similar pharmacological agents, e.g. Novocaine)
Participants with allergies to ultrasound gel
Failure of the Perfusion Index Ulnar/Ulnar+Radial Ratio test (Ratio <0.4)
Unwillingness or inability to remove nail polish, nail jewelry, or artificial nails from test digits. Bruised nail bed of test digits.
Unwillingness or inability to cut/trim fingernail(s) of test digits if determined length will interfere with correct application of the sensor
Piercing at application site of the ear or nose sensors that may interfere with correct placement of sensor
Participants received colored intravascular dye within the past 48 hours (e.g. Indocyanine green, methylene blue, dyes used in cardiac output monitoring)
Surgical hardware in pathway of Device Under Test
Other known health conditions should be considered upon disclosure in health assessment form
All
The study population will include a minimum of 72 to approximately 90 healthy adult volunteers, divided into 2 test groups.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Monica Rabanal, NP | Element Desaturation Lab | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Element Materials Technology | Louisville | Colorado | 80027 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Maximum differential mean bias as developed by Philips for the M1133AX5, M1133AX6, AlarX4 (nasal ala application), and AlarX4 (earlobe application) in the SaO2 ranges of 70% ≤ SaO2 ≤ 85% and 85% < SaO2 ≤100%. |
| OCTOBER 2025-JANUARY 2026 |
| PIGMENTATION DIFFERENTIAL BIAS | Pigmentation differential bias as proposed by ISO for the M1133AX5, M1133AX6, AlarX4 (nasal ala application), and AlarX4 (earlobe application) over the SaO2 range of 80-90%, centered at 85%. | OCTOBER 2025-JANUARY 2026 |