Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized, double-blind, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial investigates the effects of two different surgical approaches - the conventional technique and a minimally invasive technique - during bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) for mandibular deformity correction. The study will be conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University.
Each patient will receive both surgical techniques, randomly assigned to either side of the mandible. All procedures will be performed under general anesthesia by the same surgeon. Intraoperative outcomes including bleeding volume and operative time will be recorded. Postoperative evaluations will be conducted on day 1, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and at 3 months to assess pain and swelling.
This study aims to determine whether the minimally invasive SSRO technique can improve surgical efficiency and reduce postoperative morbidity compared to the conventional approach, without compromising treatment outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally Invasive Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy | Experimental |
| |
| Conventional Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally Invasive Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy | Procedure | This procedure involves a limited mucosal incision and tunnel dissection technique combined with low and short osteotomy and minimal soft tissue manipulation. The goal is to reduce surgical trauma, edema, blood loss, and operative time while maintaining clinical effectiveness. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operative Time | Operative time will be measured in minutes, separately for the right and left sides, from the initial skin incision to the final suture placement, using a chronometer. | Intraoperative period (from skin incision to final suture placement) |
| Bleeding | Bleeding volume will be measured in milliliters from the initial skin incision to the final suture placement, using separate calibrated aspirators for the left and right sides. | Intraoperative period (from skin incision to final suture placement) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Edema | The 3dMD imaging system (3dMD, Atlanta, GA) and 3dMD Vultus software were used to evaluate the amount of postoperative edema. Three-dimensional images were taken with the teeth in maximum intercuspation, lips relaxed, and eyes open on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, 30, and 90. Edema was calculated separately for the right and left sides and was recorded as surface area in square centimeters (cm²). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Kayseri | 38039 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Conventional Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy | Procedure | This procedure follows the traditional wide exposure technique with full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap elevation. This method is widely accepted and serves as the control for comparison. |
|
| Postoperative days 1, 7, 14, and 30 |
| Postoperative Pain | Postoperative pain was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale for the right and left sides separately. In this scale, '0' meant no pain, and '100' represented maximum pain. Patients were questioned at postoperative 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, and 12th hours, and the results were recorded in the patient follow-up form. | Postoperative hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 |