Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone is an approach that helps preserve soft and hard tissue architecture. However, post extraction bone resorption is still a significant challenge. The socket shield technique (SST) has emerged as a promising way for preserving the buccal plate, potentially improving implant stability and reducing radiographic bone loss. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the socket shield technique in the maxillary esthetic zone by assessing implant stability, radiographic bone loss as well as esthetic outcome over a specified follow-up period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Socket shield and immediate implant | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket shield concept and immediate implant placement | Procedure | Tooth Sectioning: The tooth will be sectioned mesiodistally using a fissure bur, preserving the buccal segment. Palatal fragment extraction: carefully after sectioning the tooth , the palatal fragment is luxated and extracted with the most important factor is taking care of the buccal part not to become loose , the extraction is done using a periotome to be minimally invasive and to preserve the bone from major damage. Shield Preparation: The buccal fragment is reduced to bone level using a round bur, a beveled edge is created using a diamond football bur, and the shield is thinned to maintain structural integrity. Implant Site Preparation: Sequential osteotomy performed under copious irrigation, ensuring primary stability. Implant Placement: A Megagen implant is inserted |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in pain scores | Pain will be evaluated, using visual analogue scale (VAS) as follows: (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe) (Figure 1) | baseline, 7, 14, and 21 days |
| Change in implant stability | The base line primary Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) will be measured at the time of implant placement, while the secondary stability quotient will be measured after 6months during the prosthetic phase preparation. | baseline and 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in post operative healing | The wound healing will be assessed based on Landry Wound Healing Index. The Landry Index uses a numerical score based on the assessment of four given parameters (Erythema., Edema, Wound Margin Adaptation, and Presence of Exudate). Each parameter is given a score depending on its severity, and the total score determine an overall evaluation of wound healing | baseline, 7, 14, and 21 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed M Issa, BDS | Contact | +961 76 476 204 | mohamadmarwanissa@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beirut Arab University | Beirut | 11-5020 | Lebanon |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| change in crestal alveolar process width | The width of the crestal alveolar process will be assessed by determination of the dimensional changes of Bucco-palatal ridge in the 6 months' scan. Measurements will be taken from the preoperative records and compared to those taken in the 6 month ones. | baseline and 6 months |
| change in labial bone thickness | the assessment of the thickness labial plate of bone in the scan performed after 6 months and comparing it with the preoperative CBCT scans. | baseline and 6 months |