Immediate implant placement has proven to be a successful treatment procedure that is preferred by patients because of being less traumatic, more time-efficient. Nowadays, the main goal of a successful immediate implant treatment has ceased to be gaining stability and osseointegration, but achieving long-term dimensional stability has become the optimal challenge. Various soft tissue and hard tissue augmentation techniques have been investigated in order to maintain the ridge dimensions following extraction and immediate implant placement.

It has been noted that the different augmentation procedures aid in decreasing the dimensional changes occurring after immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. Even though immediate implant placement is a predictable procedure, however, labial bone resorption following tooth extraction is inevitable. The available surgical techniques present do not entirely prevent dimensional variations of the peri-implant hard and soft tissues over time. Furthermore, substantial evidence showed that immediate implant placement failed to halt the resorption of the thin buccal bony plate with subsequent gingival recession, particularly in patients with thin gingival phenotype

Inclusion Criteria:

• adult (>18 years) patients having a single non-adjacent hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone
• type I socket (intact but thin labial plate of bone and intact overlying soft tissues)
• adequate palatal bone
• ≥3 mm apical bone to engage the immediately placed implants
• optimum primary stability (a minimum of 30 Ncm insertion torque) following tooth extraction.

Exclusion Criteria:

• smokers
• pregnant women
• patients with systemic diseases
• periodontal disease, gingival recession
• infected sockets
• periapical pathosis and history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the past 2 years.