Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fractional Picosecond Laser and Gold Microneedle in the Treatment of Acne Scars

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fractional Picosecond Laser and Gold Microneedle in the Treatment of Acne Scars

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a 755nm honeycomb picosecond laser versus a CO2 fractional laser for the treatment of atrophic acne Efficacy and safety of scarring.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Effectiveness of 755nm Honeycomb Picosecond Laser and CO2 Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars

Effectiveness of scarring

Participants will:

the control group(receiving 10600nm CO₂ fractional laser[AFL]treatment)and the experimental group(receiving picosecond laser with honeycomb focusing lens array[P-DLA]treatment).Facial images were captured using the VISIA skin imaging system,and the red zone,UV spot,and brown spot scores were evaluated for all subjects before each treatment,and at 1 and 3 months post-treatment.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients diagnosed with symmetrical atrophic acne scars on both sides of the face by a dermatologist; 2）Age ≥ 18 years old; 3) Voluntarily participate and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of scar tissue in the past The person; 2) History of phototherapy such as laser and radiofrequency in the past 3 months; 3) History of photosensitivity or within the past 3 months Individuals who have taken photosensitive drugs; 4) Individuals allergic to lidocaine; 5) Individuals with coagulation dysfunction; 6) In the past 3 months History of oral corticosteroids and immunosuppressants; 7) Malignant tumor patients; 8) During pregnancy or lactation Women; 9) Individuals with local facial infections or injuries.