Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Lung transplantation is a surgical intervention for end-stage lung diseases (e.g., COPD, cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). While post-transplant pulmonary function improves, peak exercise capacity remains 40-60% lower than age-matched healthy individuals due to factors like muscle weakness, reduced aerobic capacity, and immunosuppressive therapy. Although lower extremity rehabilitation is common, upper extremity (UE) function is often overlooked despite its impact on quality of life (QoL) and activities of daily living (ADLs). The 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) evaluates UE functional capacity but has not been studied in long-term lung transplant recipients (LTRs).
Objectives:
Primary: Compare UE exercise capacity between LTRs and healthy controls using 6PBRT.
Secondary: Investigate correlations between 6PBRT performance and pulmonary function, fatigue perception, ADLs, and QoL in LTRs.
Hypotheses:
H0: No significant difference in UE exercise capacity between LTRs and healthy individuals.
H1: Significant difference exists.
Methods:
Design: Cross-sectional study. Sample size calculated based on prior 6PBRT data (effect size: 1.10, power: 80%, α: 0.05).
Assessments:
Demographics: Age, sex, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). 6PBRT: Measures UE endurance (total rings moved in 6 minutes). Vital signs (SpO₂, heart rate, Borg scale for fatigue) recorded.
LTR-specific:
Pulmonary function: FEV₁, FVC, FEV₁/FVC. Fatigue: Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; scores ≥4 indicate severe fatigue). QoL: St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; 0=best, 100=worst). ADLs: London Chest ADL Questionnaire (0-5 scale).
Expected Outcomes:
LTRs will show significantly lower 6PBRT scores vs. controls. 6PBRT performance will correlate with pulmonary function, fatigue, and QoL in LTRs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Individuals | |||
| Lung Transplant Recipients |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Upper extremity functional exercise capacity | Upper Extremity Functional Capacity assessed by 6-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT). The 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) assesses upper limb endurance and functional capacity. The participant moves rings between pegs on a board using alternating hands for six minutes. The total number of rings moved is recorded as the outcome | Baseline only (single assessment, no follow-up) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory Function | Respiratory functions will be evaluated with Pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) assess lung function. Key parameters include FEV₁, FVC, and the FEV₁/FVC ratio to evaluate airflow and detect obstruction or restriction. TLC measures total lung capacity. Results will be reported in liters (L) and as a percentage of predicted normal values (based on age, sex, and height). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria for Lung Transplant Recipients:
Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Controls:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria for Lung Transplant Recipients:
Exclusion Criteria for Healthy Controls:
Not provided
Not provided
Lung transplant patients who are being followed up at Bilkent City Hospital Chest Surgery Clinic
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilkent City Hospital | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29042172 | Result | Fuller LM, El-Ansary D, Button BM, Corbett M, Snell G, Marasco S, Holland AE. Effect of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Compared to No Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jul;99(7):1257-1264.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.115. Epub 2017 Oct 16. | |
| 37086209 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect participant confidentiality and comply with local data protection regulations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline only (no follow-up) |
| Cakmak A, Kocaaga E, Sonbahar-Ulu H, Inal-Ince D, Vardar-Yagli N, Calik-Kutukcu E, Saglam M, Coplu L. Upper Extremity Exercise Capacity and Activities of Daily Living in Individuals With Bronchiectasis Versus Healthy Controls. Phys Ther. 2023 Apr 4;103(4):pzad012. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad012. |