Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Alcon Research | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Contact lens (CL) discomfort is a complex phenomenon that has been defined by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) in their seminal report on CL discomfort as a condition that results in "episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensation related to lens wear, either with or without visual disturbance resulting from reduced compatibility between the CL and the environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation of CL wear."
Contact lens (CL) discomfort is a complex phenomenon that has been defined by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) in their seminal report on CL discomfort as a condition that results in "episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensation related to lens wear, either with or without visual disturbance resulting from reduced compatibility between the CL and the environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation of CL wear."1 While CL dropout occurs in about 20% of wearers annually the majority of CL wearers who cease wearing their CLs have a desire to continue wearing their CL if given the opportunity.3 A recent review by Pucker and Tichenor found that CL discomfort was the top reason for established CL wears to cease wearing CLs Therefore, providing CL dropouts with an alternative material, which may be more comfortable than their past CLs, could be a means for curbing CL dropout.
Our recent work found that when 60 participants who had previously dropped out of CLs were given the opportunity to be refit into Dailies TOTAL1® CLs that 100% of them were still wearing Dailies TOTAL1® at 1 month and 98% of them were still wearing their CLs at 6 months. When these participants were asked at the 1-month visit, 98.3%, 86.5%, and 93.2% of them responded that they were very satisfied or satisfied with their vision, their end-of-day CL comfort, and overall CL comfort, respectively. These same participants responded at 6 months that they were very likely or likely to continue to wear the study CLs (80.7%) and to recommend the study CLs to a friend (93.2%). While these data suggest that CL dropout can thrive when being refit into a daily disposable CLs, the literature currently lacks a targeted study aimed at understanding how CL dropouts will respond to being refit into a monthly replacement CL. One good potential monthly CL option is the TOTAL30® (T30) CL. T30 is a relatively new frequent replacement CL, with a biocompatible design. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the frequency that CL dropouts who dropped out of CLs because of dryness or discomfort can be comfortably refit into T30 CLs at 1 month.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| T30 For Dropouts | Experimental | Total 30 contact lenses for those who have previously dropped out of CL wear |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T30 Contact lenses | Device | Individuals who have previously dropped out of Contact lenses (CL) due to discomfort will be refit into T30 contact lenses and their comfort with the product will be assessed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood of continuing to wear T30 CLs at 1 month and 6 months | Participants will be refit into new contact lenses and their comfort will be asked about their comfort.In which a higher score is better. | 1 month and 6 months |
| Overall satisfaction while wearing T30 CLs at 1 month and 6 months. | Comfort in the lenses will be judged at 1 and 6 months to determine if the participant is satisfied using Visual Acuity scores in which higher scores are better. | 1-6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
This determination will be made by listing Young et al.'s list of reasons for dropping out of CLs and asking the participants to indicate their top reason for dropping out of CLs:
a. Discomfort or Dryness b. General Poor Vision, c. Poor Reading Vision, d. Difficulty with Handling, e. Advised by Practitioner, f. Inconvenient, g. Eyes were Red, h. Lost Interest, i. Too Costly, j. Reaction to Care Products, k. Lost Lenses, l. Other.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Southern College of Optometry | Memphis | Tennessee | 38104 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015352 | Dry Eye Syndromes |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007766 | Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective 6 month 4 visit survey will refit individuals who have previously dropped out of contact lenses that is stopped wearing them due to discomfort into T30 contact lenses to determine if they are comfortable.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided