Randomized Control Trial: Nasal CPAP vs. NIPPV in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Randomized Control Trial: Nasal CPAP vs. NIPPV in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Primary objective: to evaluate safety and efficacy of two different non-invasive respiratory support modalities in preterm neonatal patients with respiratory distress syndrome.
Secondary objective is to compare different respiratory support mode performance in different gestational age groups.
Primary endpoint is treatment failure.
With this study, the following hypotheses will be tested:
Hypothesis 1: NIPPV has a lower failure rate compared to CPAP mode. Hypothesis 2: NIPPV complication rate is non-superior compared to CPAP.
Treatment failure is defined as any of the following:
Secondary endpoints:
Pneumothorax rate Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) Persisting ductus arteriosus (PDA) Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)
Nasal trauma:
Abdominal distension:
With this study, the following hypotheses will be tested:
Hypothesis 1: NIPPV has a lower failure rate compared to CPAP mode. Hypothesis 2: NIPPV complication rate is non-superior compared to CPAP.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
arunas.liubsys@santa.lt+370 6 872 2520
ernestas.virsilas@santa.lt+37060787438