Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benha University | Other Identifier | Al-Azhar University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Al-Azhar University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of iris suture fixation versus iris claw of posterior chamber IOLs
The eyes were randomly divided into two groups, A and B. Group A included 25 eyes in which an iris claw lens was used; specifically, the Artisan aphakia intraocular lens (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands), a PMMA IOL with an 8.5 mm length, 1.04 mm maximum height, and a 5.4 mm optical zone width. Group B also included 25 eyes, in which iris fixation of posterior chamber foldable IOLs was performed using a single-piece PMMA IOL. This IOL had a 6 mm optic, a total diameter of 12.75 mm, and featured one eyelet for suture fixation in each haptic. The A-constant used was 118.2.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A (Iris claw IOL) | Active Comparator | included 25 eyes in which the iris claw lens was used, the lens used in this study was the Artisan aphakia IOL (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) which is a PMMA IOL with an 8.5 mm length, 1.04-mm maximum height and 5.4-mm optical zone width. |
|
| Group B (Iris fixation IOL) | Active Comparator | included 25 eyes were subjected to iris fixation of posterior chamber foldable IOLs. eyes in which a single piece PMMA IOL was implanted. The IOL is 6 mm optic, 12.75 mm overall diameter, and has one eyelet for suture fixation in each haptic. A constant was 118.2. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOL implantation surgery for aphkic eye | Procedure | Aphakic eyes underwent secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using one of two techniques. In Group A, an iris-claw IOL (Artisan aphakia IOL, Ophtec BV, The Netherlands) was implanted and fixated to the mid-peripheral iris via enclavation. In Group B, a posterior chamber foldable PMMA IOL was fixated to the iris using transscleral sutures passed through eyelets in the haptics. All procedures were performed under peribulbar anesthesia using standard aseptic technique, and postoperative management included topical antibiotics and corticosteroids. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) | BCVA in logMAR , to evaluate and compare visual recovery between the iris-claw and iris suture-fixated IOL groups. | at 6 months postoperatively |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ehab Saad, Lecturer | Benha University, Ebsar Eye Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebsar Eye Center | Cairo | 4450113 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41981554 | Derived | Saad EME, Mohammed HEM, Tharwat E, Sakr AM, Abdelhafeez SME, Yusef NM, Rashed MAA, Tawfik AMR, Alsadawy MAH, Abdou ARM, Okasha MG, Alabshihy MSI, Hussein ASA, Ghazala AMA, Abd Elkader GBH, Elhaw MAGM, Eldeen MAEMS, Ali MAA, Elsayed SSE, Sayed TGE. Visual outcome, safety, and complications of iris suture fixation versus iris claw fixation for aphakic correction: a prospective randomized study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2026 Apr 14;26(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12886-026-04785-x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001035 | Aphakia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007905 | Lens Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|