Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparison of Retention of Self-etch sealants and Flowable Composite in permanent Molars.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retention of self-Etch sealants vs flowable composite in contralateral molars | Comparison of retention of self-etch sealants and flowable composite in inter-arch contralateral molars |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pit Fissure Sealant | Device | Flowable composite is being used for the purpose of sealing pits and fissures which require etching and bonding before application whereas self etch sealants are self adhesive and do not require etching and sealing. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| sealant retention | observation as to whether sealant is completely retained ,partially retained or completely lost | from enrollment to end of treatment at 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients reporting to Paedodontics and Operative dentistry department of FUCD&H will be selected according to inclusion criteria after history, clinical examination & radiographic evaluation.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foundation university college of Dentistry and Hospital | Rawalpindi | Punjab Province | 46000 | Pakistan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31710012 | Background | Singh C, Kaur K, Kapoor K. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An in vivo one-year comparative evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_122_19. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An in vivo one-year comparative evaluation | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided