Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Spinal cord injury (SCI) can be caused by trauma, inflammation, tumors, and other factors, often leading to issues such as impaired leg movement, abnormal sensation, and difficulties with bladder and bowel control. These challenges significantly affect the patient's quality of life. While there is currently no cure for spinal cord injury, the latest guidelines recommend spinal cord stimulation and robotic exoskeletons as effective rehabilitation methods.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves implanting a device that delivers electrical stimulations to aid in motor function recovery. Its safety and effectiveness have been proven in multiple clinical studies. For example, in 2022, a Swiss research team successfully helped three patients with severe spinal cord injuries regain the ability to stand, walk, and perform other movements, offering new hope for recovery.
A robotic exoskeleton is a wearable device that assists patients in movements like walking while promoting nerve and muscle recovery. This technology has become an increasingly important tool in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
Recent studies have shown that combining spinal cord stimulation and robotic exoskeletons yields better outcomes. For instance, in 2023, an American research team demonstrated that after 24 weeks of combined therapy, patients could achieve independent walking or walk with the aid of assistive devices.
This study aims to combine spinal cord stimulation with robotic exoskeleton therapy to develop personalized rehabilitation plans for patients. The goal is to restore lower limb motor function and improve long-term quality of life.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in long-term impairments in motor, sensory, and autonomic nervous functions, significantly reducing patients' quality of life and increasing the burden on families and society. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged in recent years as a key therapeutic tool for functional rehabilitation following SCI. Multiple clinical research has confirmed its safety and effectiveness. Chalif et al. evaluated the applications of SCS in managing chronic SCI in a systematic review, highlighting its potential not only for motor function rehabilitation but also for improving bladder and bowel functions, regulating respiratory pressures, and enhancing gastrointestinal motility.
On the other hand, robotic exoskeleton as an innovative rehabilitation device, has demonstrated great potential in the treatment of SCI. By providing mechanical support, robotic exoskeletons assist patients in movement training, thereby promoting neural recovery and strengthening muscle function. Numerous clinical studies have investigated the benefits of exoskeleton training for lower limb rehabilitation in SCI patients, with results showing significant improvements in walking speed and independence. Future studies should explore the combination of exoskeleton training with other rehabilitation modalities to optimize outcomes and provide more robust clinical guidance.
The combination of SCS and robotic exoskeletons represents a novel direction in motor recovery for SCI. This approach aims to activate spinal neurons via SCS to restore muscle and neural functions, while robotic exoskeletons offer gait support and assist in motor activities, providing sensory feedback to construct a complete motor-sensory loop. This combination also holds promise for spinal circuit reorganization following SCI. Gorgey et al. reported three cases in 2020 and 2023 involving epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) combined with exoskeleton training. The researchers identified optimal muscle activation parameters for walking and conducted 24 weeks of gait training with concurrent stimulation and exoskeleton use, achieving enhanced rehabilitation outcomes through this synergistic approach.
Currently, research on the combination of SCS and robotic exoskeletons for lower limb rehabilitation is limited. There is a lack of large-scale, long-term studies to validate the sustained efficacy of this combined approach. To address this gap, our study aims to develop an innovative rehabilitation system combining spatiotemporal spinal cord stimulation with real-time triggering exoskeleton. This research seeks to integrate the two systems clinically, assess their safety and effectiveness, and design personalized strategies to maximize patients' rehabilitation outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCS+EXS | Experimental | Eligible participants will undergo implantation of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring will be used to adjust stimulation parameters. SCS will be tested postoperatively to assess the patient's tolerance to stimulation and its therapeutic effects. Parameters designed to improve sensory function and bladder/bowel control will be established. All parameters will be integrated into a sequential stimulation protocol. Additionally, the simultaneous activation of the SCS and the robotic exoskeleton will be tested to ensure smooth integration. Exoskeleton-assisted training will be conducted for no less than 1 hour per day (divided into two 30-minute sessions). Other rehabilitation interventions will be provided for at least 3 hours per day. Follow-ups will be conducted at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCS+EXS | Device | Eligible participants will undergo implantation of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring will be used to adjust stimulation parameters. SCS will be tested postoperatively to assess the patient's tolerance to stimulation and its therapeutic effects. Parameters designed to improve sensory function and bladder/bowel control will be established. All parameters will be integrated into a sequential stimulation protocol. Additionally, the simultaneous activation of the SCS and the robotic exoskeleton will be tested to ensure smooth integration. Exoskeleton-assisted training will be conducted for no less than 1 hour per day (divided into two 30-minute sessions). Other rehabilitation interventions will be provided for at least 3 hours per day. Follow-ups will be conducted at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall muscle strength improvement rate at 6 month | The overall muscle strength improvement rate is calculated as (Muscle strength at 6 month - Muscle strength at baseline) / Muscle strength at baseline. Muscle strength in the key muscles of both lower limbs will be assessed using the standard methods outlined in the ASIA Manual for Muscle Strength Testing. Scores will be assigned based on examination results on a scale from 0 to 5, while the anal sphincter will be scored as 0 or 1 depending on the presence or absence of contraction. The overall muscle strength is calculated as the total score of each muscle assessed. | 6 month after combinative rehabilitation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The overall muscle strength improvement rate at 1 month | The overall muscle strength improvement rate is calculated as (Muscle strength at 6 month - Muscle strength at baseline) / Muscle strength at baseline. Muscle strength in the key muscles of both lower limbs will be assessed using the standard methods outlined in the ASIA Manual for Muscle Strength Testing. Scores will be assigned based on examination results on a scale from 0 to 5, while the anal sphincter will be scored as 0 or 1 depending on the presence or absence of contraction. The overall muscle strength is calculated as the total score of each muscle assessed. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100053 | China |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 1 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| The overall muscle strength improvement rate at 2 month | The overall muscle strength improvement rate is calculated as (Muscle strength at 6 month - Muscle strength at baseline) / Muscle strength at baseline. Muscle strength in the key muscles of both lower limbs will be assessed using the standard methods outlined in the ASIA Manual for Muscle Strength Testing. Scores will be assigned based on examination results on a scale from 0 to 5, while the anal sphincter will be scored as 0 or 1 depending on the presence or absence of contraction. The overall muscle strength is calculated as the total score of each muscle assessed. | 2 month after combinative rehabilitation |
| The overall muscle strength improvement rate at 3 month | The overall muscle strength improvement rate is calculated as (Muscle strength at 6 month - Muscle strength at baseline) / Muscle strength at baseline. Muscle strength in the key muscles of both lower limbs will be assessed using the standard methods outlined in the ASIA Manual for Muscle Strength Testing. Scores will be assigned based on examination results on a scale from 0 to 5, while the anal sphincter will be scored as 0 or 1 depending on the presence or absence of contraction. The overall muscle strength is calculated as the total score of each muscle assessed. | 3 month after combinative rehabilitation |
| The overall muscle strength improvement rate at 12 month | The overall muscle strength improvement rate is calculated as (Muscle strength at 6 month - Muscle strength at baseline) / Muscle strength at baseline. Muscle strength in the key muscles of both lower limbs will be assessed using the standard methods outlined in the ASIA Manual for Muscle Strength Testing. Scores will be assigned based on examination results on a scale from 0 to 5, while the anal sphincter will be scored as 0 or 1 depending on the presence or absence of contraction. The overall muscle strength is calculated as the total score of each muscle assessed. | 12 month after combinative rehabilitation |
| Assisted standing time | The maximum standing time that the subject can maintain with minimal orthotic or manual assistance (in minutes). | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| 6-minute walking test | In a 30-meter straight corridor, mark every 3 meters. Instruct the subject to walk back and forth along the corridor as quickly as possible without hesitation or pausing when turning. Measure the maximum walking distance (in meters) covered within 6 minutes. If the subject experiences shortness of breath or fatigue, they may slow down or rest, resuming walking as soon as symptoms improve. If chest tightness, chest pain, or any other discomfort occurs, the subject should inform the tester immediately. If the subject is unable to walk, record the result as NA. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| 10-meter walking test | In a straight corridor at least 14 meters long, mark the 0, 2, 12, and 14-meter points. Instruct the subject to walk from the 0-meter mark to the 14-meter mark. Record the time taken for the toes to pass from the 2-meter mark to the 12-meter mark. Calculate the walking speed (in meters per second) by dividing 10 meters by the recorded time. The subject may choose to walk at a comfortable pace or at maximum effort, but the selected pace should be clearly documented in the record. If the subject is unable to walk, record the result as NA. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Spinal Cord Injury Walking Index | The subject is rated according to the standards provided by the Spinal Cord Injury Walking Index. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Gait parameters | The parameters are evaluated based on the gait analysis provided by the robotic exoskeleton, for example, stride length, step height, cycle, walking speed, etc. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Pain level | According to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which consists of a 100mm line, one end represents "no pain at all," and the other end represents "the most intense pain imaginable" or "pain at its extreme." The subject is asked to mark the position on the line that corresponds to the intensity of pain they are currently experiencing. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Quality of Life Scale | The Health Survey Questionnaire consists of 9 dimensions and 36 items, measuring 8 aspects of health: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), and mental health (MH). | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Electromyography parameters | Nerve conduction velocity of the peroneal nerve and tibial nerve. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Urodynamic parameters | Post-void residual volume, maximum free flow rate, and bladder compliance volume. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| Functional MRI | Spinal cord functional MRI. | 6 month after combinative rehabiliation |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |