Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:comparison between percutaneous internal ring suturing vs Conventional Laparoscopic Repair of Congenital Inguinal Hernia in male patients. Methods : this is a prospective randomized study including 109 male patients with 120 CIHs Patients were randomly categorized into two groups. Group A were subjected to laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac and narrowing of the internal ring (IR). Group B underwent PIRS. The intended primary outcome was recurrence within 1 year, besides comparing the two techniques regarding operative time, efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcome, and postoperative complications.
Introduction Since the 1990s laparoscopy has gained popularity in the management of Congenital inguinal hernia (CIH). Several laparoscopic techniques have been described, including laparoscopic disconnection of the hernial sac with narrowing of the internal ring (IIR) which was described to mimic the open technique, and the extraperitoneal approach involves using various types of needles under laparoscopic guidance to percutaneously secure a suture circumferentially around the internal ring, thus obliterating the sac opening. This study compared the short-term outcome of percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) versus laparoscopic disconnection of the hernial sac with narrowing of the internal ring in children.
Materials and Methods: This study included 109 male patients with 120 CIHs during the period from May 2022 to May 2024. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups. Group A were subjected to laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac and narrowing of the internal ring (IR). Group B underwent PIRS. The intended primary outcome was recurrence within 1 year, besides comparing the two techniques regarding operative time, efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcome, and postoperative complications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac and narrowing of the internal ring |
|
| Group B | Experimental | Percautaneous internal ring suturing |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac | Procedure | disconnection of the hernial sac at the level of the internal ring using hook diathermy with sweeping the vas and the vessels away till completely separating them from the edges of the sac, then narrowing of the internal ring by appling a vicryl 3/0 suture between the ilipubic tract and the transverse arch of the transversus abdominus muscle |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| operative time | time of the procedure estimated after trocars insertion and Inflation of the abdomen till deflation of the abdomen | the time estimated during the operation |
| intraoperative safety | injury of the vas deffernce , spermatic vessels , bleeding | the time estimated during the operation |
| Recurrence of the inguinal hernia | postoperative swelling in the inguinal region with gurgling sensation | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| cosmesis | postoperative scar | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
only male patients were included
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Abouheba, Assistant Professor | University of Alexandria | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Medicine | Alexandria | 12345 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Mar 7, 2025 | |
| Reset | Mar 25, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | Mar 25, 2025 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006552 | Hernia, Inguinal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046449 | Hernia, Abdominal |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Percutaneous internal ring suturing | Procedure | A single umbilical trocar was placed through a supraumbilical incision, and then the surgeon stood on the same side of the hernia. To choose the location for the needle puncture, the position of the IIR was assessed by pressing the inguinal region from the outside with the tip of a forceps. Under laparoscopic-guided vision, the previously prepared 18-gauge injection needle threaded with the monofilament suture was introduced into the abdominal wall through a skin puncture at the lateral edge of the internal ring. With the movements of the tip of the needle, the thread passed under the peritoneum, over the lateral half of the IIR. The thread was pushed through the barrel of the needle into the abdominal cavity and eventually made a loop. The needle was pulled out, leaving the loop of the thread inside the abdomen by hanging the loop on the endoscope this prevented the extraction of the loop with the needle and thus prevented repeating this step. Next, the thread loop was pulled out of t |
|