Needlescopic Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatrics (A Prospective Comparative Study)
Needlescopic Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatrics (A Prospective Comparative Study)
The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with traditional laparoscopic repair in children as regard operative time, cosmetic appearance, recurrence and other complications.
Patients and methods:
Preoperative assessment:
Routine labs. Imaging: to confirm diagnosis in the affected side, to evaluate contralateral side, bilateral testicular volume as volumetric stander to evaluate testicular atrophy postoperative and other anomalies.
Operative technique:
Operative steps:
A. Traditional laparoscopic repair.
STEPS:
A 5mm port for the camera is introduced at umbilicus by open technique.
Using triangulation rule to introduce two working ports.
The abdomen is insufflated with carbon dioxide to 6-8 mmHg pressure in patients under 1 year of age and to 8-10 mmHg in older children.
Diathermize the neck of the hernia sac with a diathermy hook.
A 10-15 cm absorbable suture is passed into the peritoneal cavity through the abdominal wall next to the lateral port under vision.
The purse-string stitch commences at the 2 o'clock position of the internal hernia opening.
ensure that a "complete ring" of peritoneum has been included in the purse-string stitch without significant gaps.
The purse-string suture is tied tightly using intracorporeally knot tying.
B. Needlescopic Internal Ring Suturing.
EQUIPMENT/SUTURE:
STEPS:
Patient outcomes:
Patients assessment and follow up:
Primary outcome measures:
Operative time. Intraoperative complication. Rate of conversion to open surgery.
Secondary outcome measures:
1 and 3 months after the surgery to asses:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
abdelazeez.ali@med.sohag.edu.eg00201010274505
00201005768450