Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with traditional laparoscopic repair in children as regard operative time, cosmetic appearance, recurrence and other complications.
Patients and methods:
Preoperative assessment:
Routine labs. Imaging: to confirm diagnosis in the affected side, to evaluate contralateral side, bilateral testicular volume as volumetric stander to evaluate testicular atrophy postoperative and other anomalies.
Operative technique:
Operative steps:
A. Traditional laparoscopic repair.
STEPS:
A 5mm port for the camera is introduced at umbilicus by open technique.
Using triangulation rule to introduce two working ports.
The abdomen is insufflated with carbon dioxide to 6-8 mmHg pressure in patients under 1 year of age and to 8-10 mmHg in older children.
Diathermize the neck of the hernia sac with a diathermy hook.
A 10-15 cm absorbable suture is passed into the peritoneal cavity through the abdominal wall next to the lateral port under vision.
The purse-string stitch commences at the 2 o'clock position of the internal hernia opening.
ensure that a "complete ring" of peritoneum has been included in the purse-string stitch without significant gaps.
The purse-string suture is tied tightly using intracorporeally knot tying.
B. Needlescopic Internal Ring Suturing.
EQUIPMENT/SUTURE:
STEPS:
Patient outcomes:
Patients assessment and follow up:
Primary outcome measures:
Operative time. Intraoperative complication. Rate of conversion to open surgery.
Secondary outcome measures:
1 and 3 months after the surgery to asses:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair | Active Comparator |
| |
| Traditional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | Procedure | traditional laparoscopic repair |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operative time | Operative time from start of incision making till end of operation and closure of incisions | during operation |
| Intraoperative complications | as injury to inferior epigastric vessels, vas deferens and major pelvic vessels | during operation |
| Rate of conversion to open surgery. | rate of conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery. | during operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cosmetic appearance | according to (The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating "SCAR" Scale) | 1 and 3 months after the surgery |
| Recurrence | recurrence of inguinal hernia diagnosed clinically and/or by ultrasound |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdelaziz A Abdelaziz, Resident | Contact | 00201010274505 | abdelazeez.ali@med.sohag.edu.eg | |
| Ahmed M Abd El-Moniem, Professor | Contact | 00201005768450 |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sohag University Hospitals | Recruiting | Sohag | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1. Cóbar, J. P., & Nichol, P. F. (2023). Introduction of pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Guatemala. BMC Surgery, 23(1). 2. Chang, S., Chen, J. Y., Hsu, C., Chuang, F., & Yang, S. S. D. (2015). The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in pediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study. Hernia, 20(4), 559-563. 3. Elhosary, M. A., Elbatarny, A. M., Arafa, M., Mahmoud, S. M., Ismail, K. A., et al. (2023). Needlescopic primary paediatric inguinal hernia repair by hernia sac disconnection and peritoneal closure. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 73(4), S61-S66. 4. Maat, S. C., Dreuning, K. M. A., Nordkamp, S., Van Gemert, W., Twisk, J. W. R., et al. (2021). Comparison of intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic hernia repair in children: A systematic review and pooled data-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 56(9), 1647-1656. 5. Hajong, R., Newme, K., & Moirangthem, T. (2022). A case control study of needlescopic herniotomy versus open herniotomy in children. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(7), 3633. 6. Shalaby, R., Negm, M., Elsawaf, M., Elsaied, A., Shehata, S., et al. (2021). Needlescopic disconnection and peritoneal closure for Pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a Novel technique. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 32(2), 272-278. 7. Kantor J, et al. Reliability and photographic equivalency of the SCAR Cosmesis assessment and rating (SCAR) scale, an outcome measure for postoperative scars. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(1):55-60 8. Ein, S.H. ∙ Nasr, A. ∙ Wales, P.W. ... Testicular atrophy after attempted pediatric orchidopexy for true undescended testis J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49:317-322. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Dec 7, 2025 | |
| Reset | Dec 22, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2025 | Dec 22, 2025 |
evaluate the results of Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with traditional laparoscopic repair in children as regard operative time, cosmetic appearance, recurrence and other complications
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair | Procedure | Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair |
|
| 1 and 3 months after the surgery |
| Hydrocele | diagnosed clinically and/or by ultrasound | 1 and 3 months after the surgery |
| Testicular atrophy | diagnosed clinically and/or by ultrasound (postoperative imaging: > 50% loss of testicular volume or < 25% of volume of contralateral testis). | 1 and 3 months after the surgery |